Barely Significant
← all phrases

“a strong trend”

5,726 sentences · 5,726 papers · 7,352 search hits before verification · confirmed specimen

Sighted at

p=0.077

Listed by Hankins (2013) · Otte et al. (2022)

In the literature

a strong trendP = 0.0561.1× alphagold
Compared with control mice receiving scrambled ASO, the livers of chow-fed ketogenesis-insufficient mice exhibited an 80% ± 24% diminution in total fat oxidation (Student’s t test, P < 0.001), a 76% ± 24% impairment in REs generated from β-oxidation, and a strong trend toward a decrease in total RE production rate (39% ± 23% Student’s t test, P = 0.056), despite a trend toward a 70% ± 23% increase in TCA cycle–sourced REs (Student’s t test, P = 0.1108) ( Figure 8, B and C ).
a strong trendp = 0.0561.1× alphagold
There was no significant correlation between the impact of distance on the TBW size and the number of deciles violating the race model at SOA = − 150 ms ( r = − 0.01, p = 0.94), SOA = − 50 ms ( r = − 0.06, p = 0.73) or SOA = 50 ms ( r = 0.04, p = 0.79), yet a strong trend existed at SOA = 0 ms ( r = − 0.34, p = 0.056, see Fig. 5 ).
a strong trendp = 0.0561.1× alphagold
When the regression model was run with caffeine intake as a continuous variable, the model also predicted the paraxanthine/caffeine ratio (ANOVA: F 2,200 = 5.298, p = 0.006), with type-2 diabetes being a significant predictor (Beta = 0.145; p = 0.044) and caffeine intake exhibiting a strong trend to predict the ratio (Beta = 0.137; p = 0.056).
a strong trendp = 0.0561.1× alphagold
Neurodegeneration Two-way ANOVA for cortical proBDNF (37 kDa) revealed a strong trend toward an overall ‘genotype’ effect [F(1,40) = 3.860, p = 0.056], where proBDNF was elevated in APP/PS1 mice, and a significant ‘genotype’ by ‘treatment’ interaction [F(1,40) = 5.580, p = 0.02].