Barely Significant
← all phrases

“a strong trend”

5,726 sentences · 5,726 papers · 7,352 search hits before verification · confirmed specimen

Sighted at

p=0.077

Listed by Hankins (2013) · Otte et al. (2022)

In the literature

a strong trendp = 0.0551.1× alphagold
Univariate Cox regression for OS (Table 3 ) revealed that poor baseline ECOG PS (2–3) was associated with worse survival (HR 1.72, 95% CI 1.02–2.92, p = 0.04), and major mutations showed a strong trend toward improved survival (HR 0.44, 95% CI 0.19–1.02, p = 0.055).
a strong trendP = .0551.1× alphagold
Patients receiving lactated Ringer's solution also had a strong trend of lower concentrations of plasma hydroxyisocaproic acid (interaction P = .055), a leucine degradation metabolite, and smaller decreases in phospholipid breakdown anti-inflammatory metabolite concentrations, namely 15-ketoeicosatetraenoic acid (15-oxoETE, interaction P = .063).
a strong trendp=0.0551.1× alphagold
As TCF1 was also expressed by cancer cells, we assessed its prognostic impact and found that increased percentage of TCF1 + in cancer cells was associated with a strong trend for a worse DFS in the TC (HR:2.5, 95%CI:1.0-6.5 p=0.055), a trend that became significant when the TCF1 positivity was assessed in the IF (HR:2.1, 95%CI:1.0-4.4, p=0.045) ( Table 1 , Figure 1D ).
a strong trendp = .0551.1× alphagold
A main effect emerged of semantic relation on RTs [ F (1, 20) = 5.26, p = .033, η p 2 = .208], with targets responded to faster on SR objects (865 ms) than on NR objects (882 ms), and a strong trend for a main effect of exposure duration, with participants finding the target faster after 1,250 ms [ F (1, 20) = 4.14, p = .055, η p 2 = .171; 886 and 862 ms for the 750 ms and 1,250 ms durations, respectively], but no interaction between the two [ F (1, 20) = 2.31, p = .144, η p 2 = .103].
a strong trendP = 0.0551.1× alphagold
The mammary epithelium of untreated Mcs5a -resistant congenic rats as compared with susceptible congenic control rats had equal percentages of CD3 + T cells (Figure 5a ), of which CD4 + and CD8 + T cells were equal as well, but γδTCR + T cells showed a strong trend ( P = 0.055) toward overabundance (Figure 5a ).
a strong trendp = 0.0551.1× alphagold
A priori planned comparisons using one-tailed paired t-tests revealed significantly higher scores for dilemmas with humanized than neutral persons on the H scale (H umanized : M = 60.7, SE = 2,5, N eutral : M = 56.2, SE = 2.5, T(53) = 2.36, p = 0.011), a strong trend towards higher scores on the PD scale for dilemmas with H umanized persons (H umanized : M = 59.5, SE = 3.3, N eutral : M = 56.0, SE = 2.6, T(53) = 1.63, p = 0.055), and a weaker trend towards higher scores on the EC scale (H umanized : M = 56.4, SE = 2,5, N eutral : M = 53.8, SE = 2.5, T(53) = 1.30, p = 0.099).