Barely Significant
← all phrases

“a strong trend”

5,726 sentences · 5,726 papers · 7,352 search hits before verification · confirmed specimen

Sighted at

p=0.077

Listed by Hankins (2013) · Otte et al. (2022)

In the literature

The pooled results showed a strong trend, but no significant difference was observed between TPX2 protein expression level and MFS in GI tract cancers (HR: 3.25; 95% CI: 0.99–5.51), and there was no significant heterogeneity across studies (I 2 = 0.0%, P Q = .697; fixed-effect model) (Fig. 3 ). 3.2.3 TPX2 over-expression and clinicopathological factors in GC There were only 3 studies [ 16 – 18 ] exploring the relationship between TPX2 level and clinicopathological features of GC. 3 studies were assessed the correlation between TPX2 expression and gender, lymph node metastasis (LNM) and tumor stage.
did not reach statistical significanceP = 0.0511.0× alphaplainly factual
It is worth noting that although the reduction in 12-month mortality rate with PE in this study did not reach statistical significance ( P = 0.051), we observed a strong trend that the mortality rate in the PE group was lower than that in the non-PE group, this trend is consistent with the findings of some previous studies, for example, a meta-analysis of ANCA-associated vasculitis patients, which included 9 trials and 387 patients, showed that the use of PE was associated with a positive signal of reduced mortality [ 27 ].
In patients with ER-negative breast cancer receiving chemotherapy, patients with increased CCR5 populations showed a strong trend toward reduced metastasis-free and relapse-free survival compared with the patient population showing reduced CCR5 expression in their tumors [ 9 ].
Expression of the inhibitory molecule PD-L2, on the other hand, was not as strongly affected and was significantly upregulated only by HAdV-B7, -B34, -C1, and -D26, whereas the expression showed a strong trend toward a decrease after transduction with other HAdV types such as HAdV-A18, -B21, -B50, -D17 and -D74.