“a statistical trend”

Interestingly, there was a statistical trend that suggested attenuation of tibial cortical hypertrophy in diabetic men (cortical thickness, p interaction = 0.052).

In multivariate analysis including ECOG and IMDC risk, normalized CRP kinetics alone or in combination with the normal group was identified as significant independent risk factor for OS, whereas a statistical trend was observed for PFS.

However, the between-group difference in expected rewards of gambles can be considered a statistical trend.

The pairwise comparisons of T1 and T2 (p = .007) as well as T1 and T4 (p = .001) were statistically significant and T3 and T4 (p = .066) revealed a statistical trend, whereas the other combinations showed no statistically significant difference.

Concerning survival (Table 3 ), some of the RCTs show a statistically significant benefit while others show a statistical trend or no difference.

Clinical attention to leptin has indicated that there is a statistical trend for increased cognitive scores to be associated with lower plasma leptin levels [58] .

An alpha value of P ≤ 0.05 was used for all tests and a statistical trend was defined as being less than twice the alpha value (that is, ≤ 0.1).

For survival analyses, Kaplan-Meier curves, a log-rank test, univariate analyses, and a multivariable Cox proportional hazards model were used, with a p-value ≤ 0.05 considered significant and a p-value ≤ 0.1 considered a statistical trend.

An RCT that included 95 BD patients found a statistical trend towards reduced depressive rumination following MBCT (Perich et al. 2013 ).

A p -value of less than 0.05 was considered statistically significant, whereas 0.05 < p < 0.07 was considered a statistical trend.

A statistical trend suggests that the difference started emerging earlier: at T 7 , the MI group ( M = 0.38, SE = 0.02) showed reduced cortisol values compared to the NoMI group ( M = 0.45, SE = 0.03); mean difference of 0.07, BCa 95% [0.01, 0.12], t (26) = 2.00, p = .062, Hedges’ g = 0.69, CI 95% [−0.06, 1.44].

GRS APOE (OR = 1.94; CI = 1.38–2.72; p = 0.07) and pathway‐GRSs inflammation (OR = 1.28; CI = 1.01–2.62; p = 0.07) showed a statistical trend in these groups. 3.5.

Consequently, there was a statistically significant increase of the patella shift in unloaded conditions when patients with PFI were compared to volunteers with healthy knees from 0° to 15° knee flexion and a statistical trend in 30° flexion.

Interestingly, there was a statistical trend (which did not survive significance correction for multiple comparisons) that favored this compound in global assessment of functioning, as well as in negative symptoms.

Statistical significance was considered when P values were less than .05, and a statistical trend was considered when P values were between .05 and .2 in the validation cohort.

Consistent with classification (see above), the average discriminative performance was significantly above chance (50%) for delays ≥ 160 ms, and offsets of 8.5 and 11.6° (with a statistical trend at 5.7 and 14.2°; Table 1 ).

reported a statistical trend of cavernous malformations involving cerebellar peduncle towards unfavourable short- and long-term outcomes [ 50 ].

We also identified a statistical trend between higher health literacy and higher odds of scoring all SSKS items correctly.

P values of <0.05 were taken as being statistically significant, while 0.05< P <0.1 were considered as showing a statistical trend.

This revealed that the groups were not significantly different from each other ( t (9.391) = 1.749, P = 0.11, d = 0.88, η p 2 = 0.246), but suggested a statistical trend.

Nevertheless, the present analysis revealed a statistical trend towards a posture-related modulation of post-stimulus alpha-band activity, suggesting that hand posture may not be completely neglected by blind individuals, even if the modulation was much reduced compared to the sighted group.

There was also a statistical trend towards less croup episodes ( table 1 ).

Level of significance was always set at 5 %, whereas a p value between 0.05 and 0.1 was considered as indicative of a statistical trend [ 8 ].

We observed a statistical trend toward shorter time to antibiotic de-escalation in the early ID group compared with standard care group and shorter duration of antibiotic therapy in patients with early ID consult compared to later ID consult in the subsample where an antibiotic duration recommendation was made, but neither reached statistical significance (possibly due to small sample size).

However, the analysis of within-subject Bray–Curtis dissimilarities with respect to patients’ metadata revealed no significant associations (there was a statistical trend for sex and smoking status, Figure 7 ).