Barely Significant
← all phrases

“a statistical trend”

2,799 sentences · 2,799 papers · 4,784 search hits before verification · confirmed specimen

Sighted at

p=0.09

Listed by Hankins (2013) · Otte et al. (2022)

In the literature

a statistical trendP = 0.12.0× alphagold
For the amplitude of the N2 ERP component the 3 × 2 repeated measurement ANOVAs with the factors tDCS (sham, anodal, cathodal) and hemifield (left, right) revealed a significant main effect of the factor tDCS at electrodes P3 [ F (1.9, 22.2) = 4.64, P < 0.05], and Pz [ F (1.9, 21.4) = 5.29, P < 0.05], and a statistical trend at electrode P4 [ F (1.5, 16.9) = 2.66, P = 0.1].
a statistical trendp = 0.1072.1× alphagold
FXR expression decreased in patients with cACLD (logfold −2.14 ± 0.46, p = 0.025) and dACLD (logfold −2.49 ± 0.35, p = 0.004), whereas SHP expression was similar in patients with cACLD ( p = 0.207) and showed a statistical trend to decrease in dACLD (logfold −1.97 ± 0.40, p = 0.107), as compared to controls.
a statistical trendP =.132.6× alphagold
To validate the results, a post hoc analysis of the change between 4 weeks and 8 weeks in the control group (N=17), after receiving access to the full 28-day chatbot content, revealed a similar magnitude drop in anxiety symptoms (2.72 standardized points) and a statistical trend ( P =.13).
a statistical trendp = 0.1352.7× alphagold
Results: Overall outcomes for the whole series at 6 years are comparable between haplo-cord and UD-controls for non-relapse mortality (33.0%, 95CI: 24.7–44.0 versus 34.4%, 95CI: 28.1–42.0, respectively; n.s.), and show a statistical trend in favour of haplo-cord in relapse rate (24.5%, 95CI:17.2–34.9 in haplo-cord versus 30.7%, 95CI:24.7–38.2 in UD-controls; p = 0.135) and overall survival (47.7%, 95CI: 37.6–57.8 in haplo-cord versus 37.0%, 95CI: 29.9–44.0 in UD-controls; p = 0.079).In addition, grade II-IV acute GvHD was significantly lower in the haplo-cord group (12.1% vs 40.7%, p = 0.001; 35.8% in matched vs 45.6% in mismatched controls) as well as chronic GvHD (29.9% vs 50.0%, p = 0.02; 43.6% in matched vs 55.8% in mismatched controls).