Barely Significant
← all phrases

“a significant trend”

9,775 sentences · 9,775 papers · 47,878 search hits before verification · confirmed specimen

Sighted at

p=0.09

Listed by Hankins (2013) · Otte et al. (2022)

In the literature

a significant trendp = 0.0090.2× alphagold
The results showed a significant trend with respondents’ year of study and their willingness to purchase and consume Halal meat from effectively stunned animals (Gamma = 0.210, df = 4, p = 0.009), an increasing proportion answering ‘yes’, with increasing year of study ( Table 3 ).
a significant trendp = 0.00930.2× alphagold
In addition, meta-regression of serum gastrin elevation ( Figure 4(e) and ( f )) revealed a significant positive correlation with both treatment duration and vonoprazan dosage, where longer therapy was associated with greater gastrin elevation compared with lansoprazole (coefficient = 1.7972 per week, p < 0.0001) and higher vonoprazan doses showed a significant trend toward increased gastrin levels (coefficient = 9.3422 per mg, p = 0.0093).
a significant trendp = 0.0100.2× alphagold
The plasma morphine level in the DM120 group did not change significantly (F = 0.780, p = 0.539), but the placebo group showed a significant trend of increasing plasma morphine levels (F = 3.387, p = 0.010), and the DM60 group showed a significant trend of decreasing plasma morphine levels (F = 3.051, p = 0.018).
a significant trendp < 0.010.2× alphagold
Results Musicality Test ANOVA The mean of the musicality test for vocalists was 60.27, SD = 8.21, for instrumentalists 61.19, SD = 10.57, and for non-musicians/non-singers 52.22, SD = 7.69. There was a significant trend, F (2,56.81) = 11.52, p < 0.01, ω = 0.41, indicating that instrument playing and singing capacity heightens the perceptual abilities Planned contrasts revealed that vocalists are significantly better in discriminating musical statements than non-musicians/non-singers t (65.45) = 4.20, p < 0.01 (one-tailed).
a significant trendP = 0.010.2× alphagold
In stenoses up to 40 mm long, resting wave-free flow velocity was preserved at 24.1 ± 12.6 cm/s; in stenoses over 40 mm, flow velocity was 19.1 ± 7.9, creating a significant trend ( P = 0.01) although not a significant difference in mean values by ANOVA ( P = 0.62) or T -test ( P = 0.15).
a significant trendP < 0.010.2× alphagold
a nonsignificant trendP = 0.73514.7× alphagold
In the >4 weeks treatment duration subgroup, meta-analysis indicated a nonsignificant trend for reduction in SBP between experimental and control groups [WMD = 0.55, 95% CI (−2.63, 3.72), P = 0.735]; however, in the subgroup with treatment duration ≤ 4 weeks, there was a significant trend for reduction between the two groups [WMD = −4.42, 95% CI (−6.29, −2.20) P < 0.01] ( Figure 7 , Supplementary Figure 10 ) .