Barely Significant
← all phrases

“a significant trend”

9,775 sentences · 9,775 papers · 47,878 search hits before verification · confirmed specimen

Sighted at

p=0.09

Listed by Hankins (2013) · Otte et al. (2022)

In the literature

a significant trendP = 0.0080.2× alphagold
Results indicate that across three subgroups, targeted drugs (TD) showed a significant trend toward reducing recurrence risk, with a pooled odds ratio of 0.19 (95% CI [0.06, 0.65]), reaching statistical significance (P = 0.008); induction chemotherapy (IC) had a pooled odds ratio of 0.75 (95% CI [0.55, 1.02], P = 0.07), which was not statistically significant but suggested a potentially beneficial direction; while radiotherapy (RT) showed a pooled OR of 1.83 (95% CI [1.05, 3.18], P = 0.03), statistically significant but with an effect direction suggesting this intervention may increase recurrence risk.
a significant trendp = 0.0080.2× alphagold
The difference between HR-noASD and ASD subjects in the number of transitions from face to target object was significant ( p = 0.016), whereas there was no significant difference between TD and HR-noASD groups ( p = 0.11). A significant trend in the same direction was detected for the number of transitions from the non-target object to face ( p = 0.008) as well as from the target object to the non-target object ( p = 0.015) when HR-noASD subjects were compared with the TD population.
a significant trendP = .0080.2× alphagold
When the prevalence of asthma was estimated only among patients with COVID-19 ( Table 2 ), a significant trend was observed, both in children and adults, with decreases in the asthma prevalence rates in waves II (odds ratio [OR], 0.74; P = .008; OR, 0.73; P < .001, respectively), III (OR, 0.62; P < .001; OR, 0.58; P < .001, respectively), IV (OR, 0.68; P < .001; OR, 0.70; P < .001, respectively) and V (OR, 0.53; P < .001; OR, 0.62; P < .001, respectively) compared with those in wave I ( Table 2 ).
a significant trendp = 0.0080.2× alphagold
However, a significant trend of change was found in students’ perceived D-A fit ( B = 0.001, t = 2.71, p = 0.008), students’ perceived client involvement ( B = 0.009, t = 2.39, p = 0.02), students’ general evaluation of the sessions ( B = 0.07, t = 5.28, p < 0.001), and students’ evaluation of their mood during the sessions ( B = 0.05, t = 4.07, p < 0.001).
a significant trendp = 0.0090.2× alphagold
The results showed a significant trend with respondents’ year of study and their willingness to purchase and consume Halal meat from effectively stunned animals (Gamma = 0.210, df = 4, p = 0.009), an increasing proportion answering ‘yes’, with increasing year of study ( Table 3 ).