Barely Significant
← all phrases

“a significant trend”

9,775 sentences · 9,775 papers · 47,878 search hits before verification · confirmed specimen

Sighted at

p=0.09

Listed by Hankins (2013) · Otte et al. (2022)

In the literature

For the first time, our study showed that the reimbursement of S-1 significantly changed the chemotherapeutic treatment pattern in clinical practice, and demonstrated a significant trend for improvement in the survival outcome of patients with mPC in 2010–2016 based on four institutes across Taiwan.
Then, we classified the patterns of elevational range change for all species showing a significant trend in at least one of their reference points as: (a) “contraction” when the changes of the reference points brought to a distance reduction between the extreme reference points; (b) “expansion” when the changes of the reference points brought to an increase of the distance between extreme reference points; (c) “shift” when the changes of the reference points were consistent between each other.
Calculate the information entropy, with the specific formula as follows 28 : 9 \documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \usepackage{amsmath} \usepackage{wasysym} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsbsy} \usepackage{mathrsfs} \usepackage{upgreek} \setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \begin{document}$$H\left( x \right) = - \sum \left( {P_{i} * \log 2\left( {P_{i} } \right)} \right)\left( {i = 1,2,3,...,n} \right)$$\end{document} As shown in Table 1 , by comparing the information entropy of images before and after encryption, a significant trend can be observed: the information entropy of cipher images is significantly higher than that of ordinary images.
MMT starts showed a nonsignificant drop at the onset of the PHE (−22.47 per 100,000 Medicaid enrollees; 95 % CI, −50.99 to 6.04), but a significant trend change of 1.41 per 100,000 (95 % CI, 0.37 to 2.46) that reversed the pre-PHE trend to a post-PHE trend of 1.14 per 100,000 (95 % CI, 0.12 to 2.15).
Notably, a significant trend was observed towards poorer MMSE scores with an increasing number of measurements displaying high visit-to-visit variability; MMSE scores decreased by −0.23 (95 % CI −0.29 to −0.17; ptrend<0.001) per 1 unit increase in number of high variability measurements ( Fig. 3 ). 3.2.