Barely Significant
← all phrases

“a significant trend”

9,775 sentences · 9,775 papers · 47,878 search hits before verification · confirmed specimen

Sighted at

p=0.09

Listed by Hankins (2013) · Otte et al. (2022)

In the literature

A linear regression analysis was performed to ascertain if there was a significant trend between the input parameters and the output parameters investigated, and this revealed a statistically significant correlation between the degree of miR-29B doping of the scaffold and the MMP-8: TIMP-1 ratio ( Figure 6d , Pearson's coefficient r = 0.9996; P = 0.0047).
Association of oGRS with the Prevalence of Metabolically Unhealthy Obesity and with the Age of Individuals Affected Based on oGRS, three genetic risk categories were formed (low, medium, and high), for which a significant trend was observed between higher genetic risk and a higher proportion of MUO individuals (prevalence of MUO in oGRS low : 53.8%, 95% CI: 43.6–63.7; oGRS medium : 85.2%, 95% CI: 80.3–89.3; and oGRS high : 95.6%, 95% CI: 88.7–98.7; p for trend <0.001).
Furthermore, using cut-off values to rule-out significant/advanced fibrosis (FIB-4 ≥1.3, LSM ≥5.8 kPa and LSM ≥8 kPa), we observed a significant trend of higher proportion of H . pylori -positive subjects with FIB-4 ≥1.3 (44%, p 0.04), LSM ≥5.8 kPA (66%, p 0.027), and LSM ≥8 kPa (39%, p 0.013) compared to H . pylori -negative patients (FIB-4 ≥1.3 21%; LSM ≥5.8 kPa 40%, LSM ≥8 kPa 13%) ( Fig 3A and 3B ).
In this paper, the significant level is set to 0.05, so when |Z| is greater than 1.96, there is a significant trend of change in Crop-ESV. 2.4 Hot spot analysis In our research, hot spot analysis was applied to revealing the spatial clustering pattern and temporal evolution characteristics of Crop-ESV.
After grouping HbA1c into quartiles, participants in the highest quartile (Q4: HbA1c = 6.2% ± 0.9%) had a significantly higher risk of periodontitis compared to those in the lowest quartile (Q1: HbA1c = 5.0% ± 0.2%) in the fully adjusted model (OR = 1.43, 95% CI: 1.05–1.97, P = .027), with a significant trend across quartiles (P for trend = 0.037).
demonstrated a clear stage-dependent association between LS and pre-frailty among community-dwelling older adults, with the prevalence of pre-frailty increasing progressively across LS stages and a significant trend observed after adjustment for demographic and health-related factors [ 33 ].