Barely Significant
← all phrases

“a significant trend”

9,775 sentences · 9,775 papers · 47,878 search hits before verification · confirmed specimen

Sighted at

p=0.09

Listed by Hankins (2013) · Otte et al. (2022)

In the literature

In the multivariate-adjusted model (model 3), HR estimates were 0.95 (0.82 to 1.10) for 1–2 times/week, 0.84 (0.72–0.97) for 3–6 times/week and 0.82 (0.69–0.98) for ≥7 times/week, respectively, exhibiting a significant trend ( p for trend < 0.01) between frequency of egg intake and the risk of mortality ( Table S1 ).
In trend testing for DDA intake quartiles and diabetes among prediabetic patients in Table 3 , comparing the second, third, and fourth quartiles of DDA intake to the lowest quartile, the OR and 95% CI for diabetes in the fully adjusted Model 3 were, respectively, 0.98 (0.84–1.14), 0.80 (0.68–0.94), and 0.82 (0.70–0.97), with a significant trend ( P for trend = 0.003).
40 , 41 , 43 , 44 In a study of 1404 patients with HF, no significant difference in prevalence was found between HFpEF (36%), heart failure with midrange ejection fraction (32%), and HFrEF (31%), 40 although in another study of 233 patients with HF, a significant trend for higher depression prevalence was observed across HFpEF (20%), heart failure with midrange ejection fraction (33%), and HFrEF (35%) groups. 43 Two smaller studies found no significant differences in prevalence when comparing HFpEF with HFrEF (25% versus 24%, respectively, n=105 in one study; 11% versus 22%, respectively, n=202 in the other study). 41 , 44 However, these prior studies compared depression prevalence between HF phenotypes and not with HF‐free participants.