There was likewise a positive trend between the frequency of Wikipedia use in general and the students’ study progress (p = 0.027).
← all phrases
“a positive trend”
Sighted at
p=0.09
In the literature
However, a positive trend was noted in the consumption of grains/roots/tubers ( p = 0.027), and meat/fish/egg ( p < 0.001).
Nevertheless, a positive trend was observed between the C allele and AS risk (OR 1.96; 95% CI: 1.08–3.56; p = 0.027, corrected p = 0.054), suggesting that studies with larger sample sizes are needed to confirm this potential association.
However, a positive trend in the level of testosterone was observed in a dose-dependent manner (ANOVA-trend analysis, repeated measure: P = 0.029).
In non-obese, low VAF was associated with higher mortality, whereas a positive trend was apparent between VAF and all-cause death in the obese (MV-adjustment: 0.98 [95% CI (0.96; 0.99)]; p = 0.029 vs. 1.06 [95% CI (0.97; 1.10)], p = 0.385, for non-obese and obese, respectively; p value for BMI interaction of 0.04) (Table 3 ).
Results identified that higher scores of adaptive coping styles were significantly predictive of lower scores on the impact of event scale-revised (a measure of subjective distress caused by traumatic events) and higher scores on the PTGI subscales of ‘spiritual change’ ( p < 0.001, R 2 = 0.12) and ‘relating to others’ ( p < 0.006, R 2 = 0.08), with a positive trend on the subscale of ‘personal strength’ ( p = 0.03, R 2 = 0.05).
Statistically significant differences between sampling time points were only found for xylenes (including a positive trend p = 0.03 from September 2018 to May 2019). 3.2.
This observation was supported by a positive trend in the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (effect size, −1.9 (95% CI, −3.6 to −0.2); P = 0.03).
However, West Midlands had a positive trend, increasing from 47% in the first time period to 69% in the last time period, at a rate significantly different from the rest of England ( P =0.03).
In addition, there was a positive trend in depressive symptoms, as evaluated by CSDD ( P =.03) and a falling trend in caregiver burden, as evaluated by ZBI ( P =.02) immediately following the PARO therapy.
Social functioning: A positive trend was recorded between age and social functioning scores, overall (Pearson's r = 0.21, P = 0.030), but not in stratified analyses.
From 2010 to 2015/16, a positive trend was present in expected CID over time, which was significant or marginally significant for model A (1.57 ± 0.46 days/year, p = .03), model B (2.22 ± 0.48 days/year, p = .01), and model 2 (1.0 ± 0.55 days/year, p = .12).
At T12, a positive trend between T6 VDZ trough levels and Hb was found, with an r coefficient of 0.36 ( p = 0.03), 95% IC 0.03–0.62, and reported in Figure 1 .
We repeated all statistical analyses excluding each or all the groups (involving a total of 28 subjects) mentioned above and did not find any substantial difference in the results (data not shown). IgM, IgA, and complement component C3 plasma concentrations were not signifi- cantly associated with TCDD levels (Table 2). Complement component C4 concentrations were higher in the highest TCDD group (Table 2) and a positive trend was found in regression analysis (r = 0.21; p = 0.03).
mound workers potentially exposed to external or internal (polonium-210, plutonium isotopes, or tritium) radiation (mean dose from external radiation: 26.1 mSv; max: 939.1 mSv; mean lung dose from external and internal radiation combined: 100.1 mSv; max: 17.5 Sv; mean liver dose from external and internal radiation: 34.6 mSv; max: 2.3 Sv), the mortality due to diseases of the nervous system was not different from that of the general population, regardless of the radiation status of the workers or the type of radionuclides for those with intakes, but a positive trend was suggested as SMRs increased with increasing categories of occupational cumulative dose primarily due to photons ( p = 0.03) [ 42 ].
Despite these challenges, there was a positive trend in family mental well-being, with scores increasing from 5.1 in 2020 to 6.7 in 2022 ( p = 0.031).
There was a positive trend toward improved women representation among translational or preclinical sciences (27.4% in 2018 vs 41.8% in 2021, P = .031) but not among genitourinary cancers (41.1% in 2018 vs 40.7% in 2021, P = .969).
Overall survival (OS) demonstrated a positive trend in the intervention group and was prolonged in patients with gastric cancer (71 vs. 44 days, p = 0.0313).
There was a positive trend of the correlation between the number of cTfh and the serum IL-4 concentrations in PD patients ( P = 0.032, r = 0.353).
When the ordinal increasing trend among groups was evaluated using the Jonckheere-Terpstra Trend Test, a statistically significant upward trend in FF SCUBE1 levels was detected as the oocyte yield groups increased (Standardized J-T Statistic = 2.145, p = 0.032, indicating a positive trend).
a positive trendgold
Chloride, magnesium, sodium, and selenium concentrations showed a negative trend in the HTGI group (exception: decrease in selenium ( p = 0.032)) and a positive trend in the PDI group, which resulted in significant differences in change from baseline (% A→F ) and for selenium additionally in change from baseline (% A→G ) ( Table S4 ). 3.5.
Despite a positive trend toward visual recovery ( p = 0.034), after the correction of the alpha value, the change lost its statistical significance.
For the correlation between the cluster of voxelwise interaction and cognitive tests, although the results failed to survive from the criteria of Bonferroni correction, a positive trend between DSB score and putaminal volume was observed in the participants carrying AA (r = 0.189, P = 0.034).
Transcription factors showed a positive trend (ρ = 0.845, p = 0.034; Figure 2 A), but this reflected complete saturation at 72 Pfam families across all four vertebrate species (zebrafish, frog, mouse, human, all = 72), rather than continuous diversification.
While there was no statistically significant association between sdBG and mortality, there was a positive trend (Model 1: OR 1.026, 95% CI 1.002–1.051, p = 0.036; model 2: OR 1.024, 95% CI 0.998–1.050, p = 0.067).