Barely Significant
← all phrases

“a positive trend”

11,006 sentences · 11,006 papers · 20,836 search hits before verification · confirmed specimen

Sighted at

p=0.09

Listed by Hankins (2013) · Otte et al. (2022)

In the literature

a positive trendp < 10 –160.0× alphagold
Figure 4 puts the predicted ratios in the context of the training ratios, and Table S8 of the Supporting Information quantifies their correlations, elucidating a variety of trends: (1) no_resampling shows a positive trend between the training and the predicted ratio (Pearson’s r 95% CI: [0.440, 0.496], p < 10 –16 ), but since the training and the test ratio are also positively correlated ( Figure 3 ), the latter could be the one driving the predicted ratio of positives; (2) resampling_after_clustering had a constant
a positive trendp = 0.0000050.0× alphagold
The degree of independence and the number of operations A positive trend was observed ( r = 0.38, confidence interval 0.22 ÷ 0.52, df = 129) between the child’s dependence and the number of operations he or she had undergone ( p = 0.000005) (Fig. 2 ).
Functioning of the children with hydrocephalus.
Acta Neurol Belg · 2020 · PMC7083814
a positive trendP < 0.00010.0× alphagold
Starting from the 0 dB, the first segment (0–14 dB) had a positive trend with significant variability increase ( P < 0.0001), the intermediate segment (14–32 dB) had a negative slope with a significant variability reduction ( P < 0.0001), while the last segment (32–35 dB) had a positive slope with a variability increase ( P < 0.0001).
a positive trendP value < 0.00010.0× alphagold
Principal Curve scores show a positive relationship with chlorophyll a (representing the biomass of primary producers) ( edf = 2.8, P value < 0.0001) but negative with fucoxanthin, which is a proxy of diatoms, dinoflagellates, and chrysophytes ( edf = 4.03, P value < 0.0001), whereas in another model, the scores and alloxanthin, which is a proxy of cryptophytes, display a positive trend ( efd = 3.63, P value < 0.0001; Fig. 6 ).
a negative trendp < .00010.0× alphagold
a positive trendp < .030.6× alphagold
Linear test for trend confirmed a dose–response pattern with a positive trend for both maternal income for narrow AN ( p < .03) and paternal income for narrow and broad AN (both p < .0001), but a negative trend for both maternal and paternal income for MDD (both p < .0001).
a positive trendP < 0.00010.0× alphagold
5 a); isolating the impact of EIT-guided PEEP from potential confounders by excluding studies with recruitment maneuver before PEEP trials still showed a positive trend (MD = 3.85, 95% CI [1.95, 5.75], P < 0.0001, and I 2 = 0%), thereby reinforcing the direct impact of EIT-guided PEEP on lung compliance (Fig. 5 b); and removing studies with significant positive treatment effects revealed that the overall positive trend was not driven solely by a few outlier studies, as the impact on lung compliance remained consistently positive and statistically significant (MD = 2.86, 95% CI [0.95, 4.78], P = 0.003, and I 2 = 0%) (Fig. 5 c).
a positive trendp <.00010.0× alphagold
The search term “punaise de lit” accounts for 60 % of the topic searches and shows good agreement (Kendal τ = 0.96, p < 0.0001) between the terms which show similar seasonality and a positive trend with time with the topic term ( p <.0001).
Public and media interest in bed bugs-Europe 2023.
Curr Res Insect Sci · 2024 · PMC11015338