“a numerical trend”

There was also a numerical trend for a positive relationship between amount of change and the proportion of manipulations that were correctly located: r (3) = 0.69, p = 0.19.

Additional exploratory analyses of patients with infective endocarditis/cardiac abscess as their source of infection also demonstrated no significant difference in 90-day mortality rates between early versus late initiation cohorts, although there was a numerical trend in favor of initiation on or before day five (37.8% versus 52.2% respectively, P = 0.193).

Reticular Basement Membrane There was no significant difference in the RBM thickness between COPD patients and S despite a numerical trend for increased thickness in COPD ( p = 0.2; Figure 1 ).

A numerical trend of decreasing dry matter intake with increasing CS-PFA in diet was observed: 28.7, 28.5, and 28.1 kg/day in LF, MF, and HF, respectively ( p < 0.20).

31 There was also a numerical trend toward a reduced incidence of TLR with DCB (3.4% vs 10.3%; P = .20), but the difference was not statistically significant owing to the limited statistical power. 31 More recently, in the BASKET-SMALL 2 (Basel Kosten Effektivitäts Trial-DCBs versus Drug-eluting Stents in Small Vessel Interventions 2

In the subiculum, no predictors reached significance, though boundary bias showed a numerical trend in the expected direction (β = −0.008, p = 0.204, Figure 6d ), and all other covariates were non‐significant (BPI: p = 0.968; age: p = 0.755; MoCA: p = 0.346).

There was a numerical trend toward lower DC values during the tilt phase, with a median of 4.58 (1.58; 7.56) ms ( p =0.212) for the entire cohort ( Table 5 ).

While there was a numerical trend for faster RTs with the front warning label, the main effect of label type did not reach significance, F(1, 192.17) = 1.54, p = 0.22, d = 0.18.

3 ) While RV GLS and free wall strain exhibited a numerical trend toward improvement postoperatively (RV GLS: − 16.32% vs. − 17.03%; FWS: − 18.53% vs. − 18.82%), these changes did not reach statistical significance (p = 0.227 and p = 0.768, respectively).

Subgroup analysis showed a numerical trend toward longer median PFS in patients with PD-L1 CPS ≥ 1 compared with CPS < 1 (14.0 vs. 12.8 months; P = 0.235).

In this cohort, although the patients with poor cortical venous outflow had a numerical trend of a higher incidence of HT and poor clinical outcomes, there was no observed statistical difference (HT, 53.3 vs. 40%, p = 0.256; mRS score ≥ 3, 73.3 vs. 60%, p = 0.235). 4.

Despite a numerical trend favoring the CTK group, no statistically significant differences were observed ( P = 0.259, Fig. 1 A).

Although the ECE-positive group exhibited a numerical trend toward poorer OS, the difference was not statistically significant (P = 0.270; Figure 3 ).

Outcomes In our analysis, ivabradine showed a numerical trend toward lower all-cause mortality compared to metoprolol, with a pooled odds ratio of 0.52 (95%CI: 0.17-1.64; P = 0.27), although this difference did not reach statistical significance.

74%; HR 0.51, p = 0.003); with a numerical trend at stage III (69% vs. 88%; HR 0.75, p = 0.298).

Changes in the perceived importance of a healthy diet and social support were not significant, but effect sizes suggested a numerical trend towards an advantage over the control group at four months (M difference importance = 0.1, p = 0.3, d = 0.3; M difference social support = 0.3, p = 0.08, d = 0.4).

Despite a numerical trend towards lower values (higher sensitivity) in the High IgG group, this difference did not reach statistical significance ( p = 0.301).

A numerical trend in the same direction in European participants was not significant, t (39) = 1.05, p = .302, d = 0.33 ( Figure 5 ).

These two subconditions did not differ significantly from each other, although there was a numerical trend against C+Pro sentences ( β = -0.84; z = -1.47; p = .31).

Although a numerical trend was observed, this difference was not statistically significant ( P = 0.32).

Although this difference showed a numerical trend favoring CoQ10, it did not reach statistical significance ( p = 0.329) as shown Supplementary file 3 Table 17.

Compared with IgAN patients, AAGN demonstrated significantly elevated uNAG levels (22.60 [14.00, 33.40] vs 14.40 [8.80, 22.10] U/gcr, p = 0.006), with a numerical trend toward higher uNGAL concentrations (29.30 [15.76, 45.14] vs 25.17 [13.52, 38.08] ng/mL, p = 0.333) and reduced urinary specific gravity (1.01 ± 0.01 vs. 1.02 ± 0.01, p = 0.132).

In the ≥65 years subgroup, statistically significant improvements from baseline in trough FVC were observed with FF/VI versus placebo at Days 2, 7, 14, 28, and 56, with a numerical trend in favor of FF/VI at Days 84, 112, 140, and 168 ( Supplementary Figure 2B ), and the end of the study (45 mL; p=0.334) ( Table 4 ).

In an exploratory comparison, PFS did not differ significantly between patients receiving polatuzumab vedotin– and platinum-based bridging chemotherapy, although a numerical trend toward improved outcomes was observed in the polatuzumab vedotin–based group across the different products (tisa-cel [HR, 0.82; P = .34]; liso-cel [HR, 0.72; P = .34]; supplemental Figure 2 ).

7.87 months, P = 0.036), while a numerical trend favoring acupuncture was observed in overall survival (mOS: 24.1 vs. 20.9 months, P = 0.352).