Barely Significant
← all phrases

“a numerical trend”

1,013 sentences · 1,013 papers · 1,817 search hits before verification · confirmed specimen

Sighted at

p=0.09

Listed by Hankins (2013) · Otte et al. (2022)

In the literature

Association Between Weight Reduction and PROs Although statistical tests were not conducted, results of these additional exploratory post hoc analyses showed that there was a numerical trend towards improved SF-36v2 Physical and Mental Component Summary scores in participants treated with tirzepatide achieving greater percentage reductions in weight, with participants achieving ≥ 15% weight reduction reporting the greatest improvements in component summary scores (after adjustment for baseline PRO scores) (Fig. 5 a).
Interestingly, in another study, there was a numerical trend towards a higher 30-day mortality among patients who underwent redo-TAVR for procedural versus THV failure, but this was not statistically significant (5.4% versus 1.4%, respectively; p=0.427).[ 8 ] Periprocedural complications were low, and the 30-day survival was 94.6% in those undergoing redo-TAVR for procedural failure and 98.5% in those with THV failure (p=0.101).
The confidence intervals of the hazard ratios in each group exceeded 1, and all p -values were greater than 0.05, indicating no significant differences in survival rates between the subgroups (Table 2 ).Some subgroups, particularly those with clinical stage I patients (HR = 2.15), demonstrated a numerical trend; however, none achieved statistical significance.
However, this does not alter the conclusion that encouraging subjects to attend to the items influenced retrieval of stimulus-stop associations: the authors still found a reliable effect of item type in the p (respond|stop) measure during training, a reliable effect of item type during the test phase for go reaction times, and a numerical trend in the test phase for the p (respond|stop) measure.
Nevertheless, there was a numerical trend for improved results in the modified bicaval group regarding postoperative epinephrine therapy (98 ± 44 h), norepinephrine therapy (76 ± 72 h), va-ECMO/microaxial pumps (10.0%) and successful weaning rate from va-ECMO/microaxial pump (100.0%) compared to biatrial (120 ± 92 h; 235 ± 351 h; 27.0% respectively 90.0%) and bicaval technique (153 ± 153 h; 166 ± 188 h; 28.8% respectively 70.9%).