Barely Significant
← all phrases

“a numerical trend”

1,013 sentences · 1,013 papers · 1,817 search hits before verification · confirmed specimen

Sighted at

p=0.09

Listed by Hankins (2013) · Otte et al. (2022)

In the literature

Although there was a numerical trend toward higher rates of advanced neoplasia in H. pylori + patients, we found that this association was not statistically significant (aOR 1.26; 95% CI: 0.96–1.64; p = 0.10) and this lack of statistical significance remained after multivariable adjustment (Table 3 ).
4 Overall survival (OS) analyses at SA1 revealed a numerical trend favoring D+CT versus P+CT (median 19.4 months [95% CI: 14.5–not reached] versus 15.9 months [95% CI: 11.6–19.3]; HR: 0.75 [95% CI: 0.53–1.05]; 55% maturity), 5 which was maintained at SA2 (DCO April 30, 2024; 20.2 mo [95% CI: 14.5–27.3] versus 15.9 mo [95% CI: 11.6–19.3]; HR: 0.74 [95% CI: 0.54–1.0
While infants with severe brain injury (IVH ≥ III° and periventricular cysts) have been excluded from the study a numerical trend towards higher rates of IVH ≤ II° detected by MRI at term‐equivalent age in susceptibility weighted imaging (SWI) was observed in the hsPDA group (22.7%) compared to the ntPDA (12.5%) and noPDA group (8.2%).
DRSS improvement Rates of at least 2-step DRSS improvement were largely consistent across treatment arms and between the YOSEMITE Japan subgroup and the pooled YOSEMITE/RHINE cohort at weeks 52 and 96, although there was a numerical trend for higher proportions in the faricimab arms versus the aflibercept arm in the YOSEMITE Japan subgroup (Fig. 5 ).