Barely Significant
← all phrases

“a nonsignificant trend”

5,407 sentences · 5,407 papers · 7,516 search hits before verification · confirmed specimen

Sighted at

p<0.1

Listed by Hankins (2013) · Otte et al. (2022)

In the literature

a nonsignificant trendP = 0.0921.8× alphagold
Dose escalation to > 63 Gy (maximum 66.6 Gy) to the primary tumor in 38/87 patients revealed a nonsignificant trend for improved 3‐year CFS (82.4% vs. 97%, P = 0.092), a significantly improved CFS for T2/T3 tumors (72.6% vs. 100%, P = 0.008), and a significantly improved 3‐year PFS for T1/T2 tumors (76.7% vs. 100%, P = 0.035).
a nonsignificant trendp = 0.0931.9× alphagold
Kaplan–Meier estimates suggested a nonsignificant trend toward higher recurrence in ChC versus ICM (56.1% versus 43.4%; p = 0.093), with no differences between ChC and idiopathic DCM (56.1% versus 52.1%; p = 0.434) or between ICM and idiopathic DCM (43.4% versus 52.1%; p = 0.535; Fig. 4 A).
a nonsignificant trendp = 0.0931.9× alphagold
Post hoc comparisons revealed a significant reduction (43%) in mGluR5 binding in the hippocampus of AD ( BP ND = 0.76 ± 0.41) compared to CN ( BP ND = 1.34 ± 0.58, p = 0.003, unpaired t test) participants, and a nonsignificant trend for a reduction in a composite association cortical region in AD ( BP ND = 1.57 ± 0.25) compared to CN ( BP ND = 1.86 ± 0.63, p = 0.093) participants.
PET imaging of mGluR5 in Alzheimer's disease.
Alzheimers Res Ther · 2020 · PMC6969979
a nonsignificant trendp = 0.0941.9× alphagold
Compared with bevacizumab, aflibercept extended final treatment intervals by 2.14 weeks ( p < 0.001) and reduced the total number of injections by 2.35 ( p = 0.001), while ranibizumab showed a nonsignificant trend toward longer final intervals (+0.84 weeks; p = 0.094) and did not significantly reduce injection count (−0.51; p = 0.299).
a nonsignificant trendp = 0.09401.9× alphagold
While there was a nonsignificant trend toward increased iNOS‐positive proinflammatory macrophages at 2‐day postclosure ( p = 0.0940) and Arginase‐1‐positive proresolution macrophages at 7‐day postclosure ( p = 0.1672) (Figure 7b,c ), we observed an enhancement of Arginase‐1 response (proresolution macrophages) at 7‐day postclosure versus 2 days with LASE ( p = 0.0207) which did not reach significance for sutures ( p = 0.2693).