Barely Significant
← all phrases

“a nonsignificant trend”

5,407 sentences · 5,407 papers · 7,516 search hits before verification · confirmed specimen

Sighted at

p<0.1

Listed by Hankins (2013) · Otte et al. (2022)

In the literature

a nonsignificant trendP = .091.8× alphagold
[ 15 – 17 ] A meta-analysis of 4 randomized controlled trials with 1130 patients (816 receiving pridopidine, 314 receiving placebo) found a nonsignificant trend favoring pridopidine in the Unified HD Rating Scale Total Motor Score (mean difference, −0.93; 95% CI, −2.01 to 0.14; P = .09).
a nonsignificant trendP = 0.091.8× alphagold
Patients over 69 years were less likely to undergo decompression (OR 0.8, 95% CI [0.7-0.85], P < 0.001) and LFS (OR 0.6, 95% CI [0.5-0.6], P < 0.001), while patients under 50 years showed a nonsignificant trend toward decreased decompression risk (OR 0.9, 95% CI [0.7-1.02], P = 0.09) and increase LFS risk (OR 1.1, 95% CI [0.9-1.3], P = 0.5) ( Table 4 ).
a nonsignificant trendp = .091.8× alphagold
Moreover, there was a nonsignificant trend towards an interaction of T1-T2 sequence and SOA, F (1, 31) = 2.99, p = .09, η p 2 = .09, suggesting faster responses with short than with long SOA in repetition trials (924 ms vs. 977 ms; t [31] = −2.93, p < .01, d = 0.14), but no RT differences across SOAs in switch trials (939 ms vs. 959 ms; t [31] = −1.38, p = .18, d = 0.06).
a nonsignificant trendp = 0.091.8× alphagold
Mean achieved METs showed a nonsignificant trend toward lower values in the event group (10.92 ± 3.46 vs. 12.13 ± 2.38, p = 0.09); however, poor functional capacity (METs < 7) was significantly more prevalent among patients with events (15.4% vs. 2.6%, p = 0.022). 3.4.