These measurements were repeated after 26 weeks of use of monacolin K reporting a significant reduction in FLI, while HIS and ARFI had only a nonsignificant trend to improvement.
← all phrases
“a nonsignificant trend”
Sighted at
p<0.1
In the literature
Prospective trials comparing HiFlo with standard bronchiolitis therapy (low-flow 100% oxygen) have shown improved oxygen saturation levels [ 19 ], fewer treatment failures [ 20 , 21 ], and a nonsignificant trend toward faster weaning from oxygen [ 20 ].
As shown in Figure 6c , only BCG induced statistically significant reduction of lung bacterial burden, while TB-PCF only showed a nonsignificant trend towards reduction.
51 , 52 Our data certainly show a nonsignificant trend of reduced myoinositol in DTI‐defined invasive regions where previous histological studies have shown extensive invasion with high glioma cells 8 replacing other normal cell populations (including astrocytes).
A nonsignificant trend toward improved OS was observed in the BsAb-exposed group in the IPTW model, but this was not confirmed in the PSM analysis.
There was a nonsignificant trend in race‐based, but no sex‐based, differences in the association between QRS duration and mortality.
Besides a nonsignificant trend toward small intracanalicular tumors within the group who lost serviceable hearing, there were no dosimetric trends or predictors.
Another study involving 18 F-fluoropropyl-beta-CIT PET showed a correlation between sequence learning and caudate nucleus binding in PD, with a nonsignificant trend toward the right side. 42 In addition to the presupplementary motor area, the right caudate nucleus has been described as the region mainly activated in an fMRI task involving spatial attention and motor preparation. 43 Moreover, reactive inhibition—a mechanism that might be crucial in a reversed r
The LID animals did not significantly differ from MPTP and non-LID groups, although there was a nonsignificant trend of increased DA in striatal structures ( Fig. 1C ), which may have arisen from high variance of DA levels in the LID group and the relatively small number of animals.
While there is a nonsignificant trend towards lower rates of stroke and systemic embolism in the PFO closure arms in this study, the striking difference between this effect and the effects seen in the most recent randomized trials suggests that patient selection in practice may not be optimal, and this should be further investigated.
There was a nonsignificant trend toward higher rates of absenteeism in patients with ulcerative colitis (22.4%) and Crohn’s disease (20%) relative to controls (13.6%), although rates were similar to controls for IBD patients in remission (14.4%).
In the subgroup of patients with low-risk hormone receptor-positive disease (defined as one or none of the following risk factors: disease-free interval ⩽24 months; visceral metastases; prior anthracycline and/or taxane; or ⩾3 metastatic organ sites), there was a nonsignificant trend in OS favouring BEV–CAP.
There were minimal practice effects, with only a nonsignificant trend (after correction for multiple tests) for an increase in dysfluency from the first to the retest administration in narration for the two older age groups.
In a nonsignificant trend, increasing MH concentration resulted in fewer pores within the optimal range ( Figure 3 ).
Our results however indicated only a nonsignificant trend for lower active motor threshold, suggesting that the hemisphere contralateral to the lesion was still relatively preserved.
For BCR prediction, ISUP, iPSA, PSAD, and SUV peak were each significant in univariable analyses, whereas SUV max showed a nonsignificant trend.
The frequency of symptomatic hypoglycemia was similar between the two groups despite a nonsignificant trend to fewer episodes of severe hypoglycemia and severe nocturnal hypoglycemia in those treated with insulin glargine.
However, in contrast with previous in vitro data [ 66 , 68 ], although we observed a nonsignificant trend of reduction at 21 days, this type of approach was insufficient to reduce osteolysis in vivo ( Figure S1A,B ).
As a likely compensatory response, 1 h after chemogenetic activation, microglial process coverage increased around endothelial cells (P = 0.001) and smooth muscle cells (P = 0.026), whereas a nonsignificant trend was observed in process coverage of pericytes ( Fig. 4 h ).
Contrary to the state EDA findings, there was a nonsignificant trend for greater HRV to become increasingly associated with lower rejection rates as interoceptive accuracy worsened .
Severe Hypoglycemia There was a nonsignificant trend towards higher rates of severe hypoglycemia with more advanced baseline GFR category (Figs. 1 , 2 ), with the risk of severe hypoglycemia increasing with decreasing baseline eGFR (Fig.
There was also a nonsignificant trend in mean seizure frequency reduction between the 2 groups, with reduction of seizures in the treatment and control groups of 44.0% and 11.1%, respectively.
This is supported by recent meta-analysis suggesting that although GDT does not improve mortality, it may reduce complications and hospital length of stay[ 43 ] and subsequent meta-analysis found a reduction in cardiovascular complications with this practice.[ 44 ] However, a follow-up large, randomized trial of perioperative GDT in high-risk patients undergoing noncardiac surgery did not definitely support the practice but did demonstrate a nonsignificant trend supporting GDT.[ 45 ] Therefore, at this point, no consensus on the true benefit of perioperative GDT exits, but further prospective study is underway.
On the other hand, a controlled crossover trial in patients with septic shock found detrimental effects of dobutamine on muscle and hepatic perfusion, a lack of improvement in peripheral perfusion, and a nonsignificant trend toward an increase in the proportion of perfused sublingual capillaries.
Fasting Metabolic Markers There was a nonsignificant trend toward increased fasting glucose in those receiving alpelisib (plasma glucose 84 ± 5 mg/dL after placebo vs. 93 ± 11 mg/dL after alpelisib; P adj = 0.10) ( Fig. 2 A ).