Barely Significant
← all phrases

“a negative trend”

4,202 sentences · 4,202 papers · 9,832 search hits before verification · confirmed specimen

Sighted at

p=0.09

Listed by Hankins (2013) · Otte et al. (2022)

In the literature

a negative trendp = 0.0531.1× alphagold
Results from follow-up analyses on RD and AD revealed a negative relationship between memory improvement and AD in a small cluster of 21 voxels ( p < 0.05) located in the right inferior fronto-occipital fasciculus, while a negative trend was observed for RD ( p = 0.053) in anterior parts of the corpus callosum.
a negative trendp = 0.0551.1× alphagold
However, in a multivariable model adjusted for age and sex, a negative trend was observed in patients with a baseline mSASSS of ⩽24 at the 2-year interval (β = −0.888, 95% CI: −1.793 to 0.017, p = 0.055), although this association did not meet conventional thresholds for statistical significance.
a negative trendp = 0.0551.1× alphagold
borderline significancep = 0.0551.1× alpha
The “ENTP6 and SMOC1” combination exhibited a negative trend with borderline significance (p = 0.055).
a negative trendp = 0.0551.1× alphagold
In the present study, we found a negative trend for the correlation between right OFC GMV of patients with SCI and injury duration ( p = 0.055) and a significant negative correlation between right OFC GMV of sub-acute subgroup and injury duration ( p = 0.035), indicating that longer disease course may lead to severer GM atrophy, especially in the sub-acute stage (duration 1–12 months), which is consistent with the findings of some previous studies (Freund et al., 2011 , 2013 ).
a positive trendp = 0.0551.1× alphagold
a negative trendp = 0.0591.2× alphagold
Vasopressin model—females The final model for vasopressin in females contained two friendship variables that neared significance: a positive trend for the total number of friendships initiated by subjects ( F (1,19) = 4.180, p = 0.055; Figure 4 , top panel), and a negative trend for the total number of play friendships ( F (1,19) = 4.021, p = 0.059; Figure 4 , bottom panel).
a negative trendP = 0.0561.1× alphagold
Indeed, in a sensitivity analysis between LDL-C within patients with statin therapy a negative trend between LDL-C and iEAT was observed (β-3.9 95%-CI: −7.8 – 0.11, P = 0.056), whereas in the patients without statins no significant associations were observed (β: 0.91, 95%-CI: −7.0 – 8.8, P = 0.817).
a negative trendp = 0.0561.1× alphagold
While we found there to be no significant relationship between fractal dimension and first-year growth, the association had a negative trend with a high level of uncertainty ( p = 0.056; Table S9), suggesting that the limited range of fractal dimension values in our study may have constrained our ability to detect a significant effect.