Although not statistically significant, regular dental check-up attendance showed a near-significant trend ( p = 0.054).
← all phrases
“a near-significant trend”
Sighted at
p=0.07
In the literature
The latter showed a near-significant trend ( p = .054) while the former comfortably passed the conventional alpha threshold, for both adult-report and child-report, providing important replications from both parent and child perspectives.
Among early-onset cases, the median age at diagnosis was slightly higher in FOLFOX-treated patients (42 years; IQR 36–47) compared with those who did not receive FOLFOX (40 years; IQR 34–43), with a near-significant trend ( p = 0.0541).
At 6 months, significant improvements in nutrition knowledge were limited to the diet–disease relationship and weight management section for the intervention group ( p = 0.026), with a near-significant trend in the combined groups ( p = 0.055) ( Table 4 ).
Results At Test 1, the experimental group showed significantly shorter puncture time (P = 0.042) and a near-significant trend for skin disinfection time (P = 0.055), while total task time did not differ significantly.
A near-significant trend could also be observed for pain localized in the upper abdomen ( p = 0.055, Table 4 ).
19.1%, p = 0.028), with a near-significant trend observed for patients with variant morphology compared to classical morphology (34.1% vs. 20.2%, p = 0.055).
In addition, hematocrit values demonstrated a near-significant trend ( P = 0.055) across grades.
In contrast, analysis of venous events ( Table 4 ) showed a near-significant trend for lower creatinine ( p = 0.056) and significantly higher platelet counts in COVID-19 patients.
Clonality was associated with distant metastases ( p = 0.037) and surgical margin involvement ( p = 0.022)., and showed a near-significant trend with ( p = 0.056).
Repeated measures analysis of covariance after adjusting the covariate variables revealed that the volume of bleeding showed a near-significant trend in the treatment group compared with that in the control group ( p =0.056).
Moreover, Quartile 4 showed a near-significant trend (HR = 0.694, 95%CI: 0.476-1.010, P = 0.056). postTyG-BW Quartile 4 (HR = 0.471, 95%CI: 0.312-0.713, P < 0.001) was associated with a significantly reduced mortality risk. postTyG-BMI Quartiles 3 (HR = 0.619, 95%CI: 0.422-0.908, P = 0.014) and 4 (HR = 0.535, 95%CI: 0.361-0.794, P = 0.002) showed a significantly reduced mortality risk ( Figure 5 ).
However, beta dispersion analyses showed significance among sampling locations was significant for Bray–Curtis distances (PERMDISP p < 0.001) and showed a near-significant trend for weighted UniFrac (PERMDISP p = 0.056).
Similarly, Muribaculaceae abundance increased from 2.95% in the CON group to 7.52% in the CB3 group, showing a near-significant trend ( p = 0.056).
In the PD group, there was a near-significant trend towards higher UCHL1 levels in carriers of long SNCA Rep1 alleles vs short alleles (5.21 vs 3.71 pg/ml, p = 0.056, Figure 2 ), while a non-significant trend was seen in healthy controls carrying long Rep1 vs short alleles (3.39 vs 1.42 pg/ml, p = 0.207), adjusted for age and gender, and disease duration in the PD group.
We found a near-significant trend toward an increase in call frequency from Pten Y68H/ + pups separated from mothers compared to littermate controls ( P = 0.057), suggesting greater anxiety in Pten Y68H/ + mice (Fig. 2 l).
KOOS Sport scores improved significantly from baseline to six, 12, and 24 months (p<0.0001), with a near-significant trend toward improvement at three months (p=0.057).
Patients with HR lesions exhibited a near-significant trend toward shorter survival from EMD occurrence compared with those without HR involvement (17 months, 95% CI 11–34 vs. 40 months, 95% CI 28–53; p = 0.057).
The difference of OS benefit across PD-L1 subgroups obtained a near-significant trend ( P = .057).
DC was associated with better neurological status at discharge (PCPC, p = 0.029); the difference at 3 months was not statistically significant but showed a near-significant trend ( p = 0.057).
Exploratory pairwise comparisons further suggested a reduction in closed-arm distance in the CUMS-BerryH group ( p = 0.0486), with a near-significant trend also observed in the CUMS-BrahmiBerryH group ( p = 0.0574).
A near-significant trend with arthritis was observed ( R = − 0.350, p = 0.058).
Association between measures of sleep, cognition and quality-of-life After adjustment for age and history of COVID-19-related hospitalization, lower performance on NIH Toolbox attention test was associated with lower sleep efficiency (β = 0.55, p = 0.039) and a near-significant trend with longer sleep latency (β = −1.55, p = 0.058), while lower processing speed was associated with lower sleep efficiency (β = 1.27, p = 0.004), longer sleep latency (β = −0.31, p = 0.027), more WASO (β = −0.31, p = 0.025), and more awakenings (β = −0.56, p = 0.016).
Notably, the follow-up duration was 26.1 ± 26.4 weeks in the error group versus 22.2 ± 32.7 weeks in the no error group, showing a near-significant trend ( p = 0.058).
GH abnormality demonstrated a near-significant trend with Fisher scale (ρ = 0.33, p = 0.058, 95% CI: −0.04 to 0.63).