“a marginal trend”

[ 39 , 40 ] However, other studies in general critical care populations, [ 33 , 41 , 42 ] as well as our adjusted TBI-specific analysis, found no statistically significant association between lower vitamin D levels and nosocomial infection, though our data showed a marginal trend ( P = .077).

Pulse duration showed a marginal trend with SLc ( χ 1 2 = 3.13, p = 0.077).

A marginal trend was observed for the inconsistency component ( Q _inc = 12.81, df = 7, P = 0.077), though this did not reach statistical significance.

A marginal trend toward delayed sepsis onset was noted in the Gram-positive group, yet this did not achieve the threshold for significance ( p = 0.078).

A marginal trend was observed in execution and management ( P = 0.079), with higher scores among those who were not willing (Table 9 ).

When depression and anxiety were included as between-subject factors in the model, the previously significant three-way interaction among memory, emotion, and age was reduced to a marginal trend (F(2, 320) = 2.564, p = 0.079, ηp 2 = 0.016), possibly due to the decrease in affective scores in aging.

2 F), and also a marginal trend ( P = 0.0794) toward less depression-like behavior in forced swim test (Fig. 2 G).

Among cases, a comparison of the differences between expression using the Mann–Whitney U test demonstrated a marginal trend between cancer patients and both hemoptysis patients and transplant recipients ( p = 0.08 and p = 0.09, respectively).

Age showed a marginal trend toward higher HbA1c with increasing years (β = 0.01, p = 0.080), though this did not reach statistical significance.

There was a marginal trend for the interaction term for GDP per capita by non-disclosure due to fear of losing one’s job ( p = 0.08), suggesting that individuals living in countries with higher GDP per capita who did not tell their employer because they feared losing their job were more likely to have higher levels of absenteeism.

IL-6 showed a marginal trend (log 2 FC = -0.619, p = 0.080).

In the same model, subfield x quadratic age interactions were significant for subiculum ( p < 0.0001), CA1 ( p < 0.005), molecular layer ( p < 0.0001), and hippocampal tail ( p < 0.0001), with a marginal trend for GC-DG (lin. p < 0.08, quad. p < 0.005; see Fig. 1a , bottom; Tables 2 & 3 , left).

Conversely, among men, none of the examined variables reached statistical significance, though overweight prevalence showed a marginal trend towards association with diabetes prevalence (urban: P= 0.08; rural: P= 0.08).

Although Compulsive Behavior did not show a statistically significant association with food approach, a marginal trend was observed ( p = 0.080). 3.5.

A marginal trend was observed for total List A recall ( F = 2.51; df = 2, 219; p = 0.08) with a somewhat larger effect of exposure in the 0.05- and 0.5-ppm conditions ( Figure 4 ).

However, a marginal trend toward a higher rate of lymph node metastasis was observed in the P286R group compared to the V411L group (15.6% [10/64] vs. 5.2% [3/58], p = 0.080).

There was a marginal trend for gender differences in depression level (p = 0.08) but not a significant difference in the unadjusted bivariate comparison.

The HOXB13 gene mutation showed a marginal trend between PCa compared to BPH cases, (chi-square (2, N= 55) = 5.1, p= 0.08).

However, DBS OFF patients were significantly more likely to switch after punishment (p < 0.005), and had a marginal trend to stick more often after rewards (p = 0.08) (see Table 2 ).

A marginal trend favoring the e-learning group was noted in the fifth-year subgroup ( P =.08), although it did not reach statistical significance.

A significant main effect of Body Action Type, F (2,54) = 3.72; p = 0.03; η 2 = 0.12, and a marginal trend for the factor Language Group, F (1,27) = 3.12; p = 0.08; η 2 = 0.10, were found.

There was a marginal trend toward cases independently having a higher pre-ART viral load ( P = .08), a lower weight for age or BMI for age ( P = .0503 or P = .08, respectively), and a lower CD4 + T-cell percentage ( P = .06) than controls (other model coefficients were unchanged).

A marginal trend was observed for Avoidance, F (1, 30) = 3.28, p = .080, η2 = .098.

Healthy behaviors were not significantly related to number of life events, though a marginal trend emerged for leisure activity, such that those who had more events during the year were less likely to be active ( r (229) = −.12, p = .08).

Both UD and HID showed lower hazard ratios for RFS compared with MSD (HR 0.721 95% CI 0.467–1.114, and HR 0.695, 95% CI 0.462–1.046, respectively), though only HID exhibited a marginal trend toward improved outcomes ( p = 0.081).