Barely Significant
← all phrases

“a borderline significant trend”

232 sentences · 232 papers · 304 search hits before verification · confirmed specimen

Sighted at

p=0.09

Listed by Hankins (2013) · Otte et al. (2022)

In the literature

a borderline significant trendp = 0.0641.3× alphagold
Although, both models provided evidence for tilt-angle dependency of PE influence on sBP (β 2 coefficient in Equation 2), one model also showed a borderline significant trend (parametric bootstrap p = 0.064) toward contribution from PE frequency (β 1 coefficient in Equation 2) with rather a small effect size (β 1 ≃ 0.09, i.e., ΔsBP = 2.2 mmHg).
a borderline significant trendp = 0.0661.3× alphagold
Associations between Dietary Iron and Risk on Elevated Fasting Glucose Stratified by the rs10830963 Risk Allele in the MTNR1B Gene After adjusting for age, sex, region, years of education, physical activity level, intentional physical exercise, smoking status, alcohol use, and total energy, a borderline significant trend was observed across the quartiles of total dietary iron and risk of elevated fasting glucose among G allele non-carriers ( p = 0.066), while a linear trend was found among G allele carriers ( p = 0.033) in all participants ( Table 3 and Figure 2 ).
a borderline significant trendp = 0.0701.4× alphagold
In the fully adjusted model (Model 4), which included demographics, lifestyle factors, and comorbidities, significant inverse association remained evident in the combined analysis (Q2: HR 0.841, 95% CI: 0.741–0.954, p = 0.007; Q3: HR 0.817, 95% CI: 0.686–0.972, p = 0.023), with a borderline significant trend for Q4 (HR 0.800, 95% CI: 0.629–1.018, p = 0.070).
a borderline significant trendp = 0.0741.5× alphagold
Meta-analysis suggested a significant reduction in plasma concentrations of total cholesterol (WMD: −9.49 mg/dL, 95% CI: −17.07, −1.92, p = 0.014) and a borderline significant trend in reduction of LDL-C (WMD: −4.67 mg/dL, 95% CI: −9.78, 0.45, p = 0.074) following L-carnitine supplementation ( Fig. 5 ).
a borderline significant trendp=0.0761.5× alphagold
A borderline significant trend was observed when comparing the mean change in SUV max and mSUV max between the 2 groups (SUV max : -0.23 [-0.49 to 0.03] g/ml, p=0.076; mSUV max : -0.21 [-0.46 to 0.03] g/ml, p=0.077) ( Figures 2A, B ).