Barely Significant

Excerpts

514,629 sentences

highly significantP < 0.00010.0× alphaqualifiedgold
Expressing the survival as CFU/ml instead of as percentages however reveals a highly significant difference between the strains in the actual number of surviving bacteria at 2, 9, and 21 h post-penicillin addition ( P < 0.0001), which again can be explained as a significant strain dependent difference in invasiveness (Figure 5 ).
highly significantp = 0.00010.0× alphaqualifiedgold
Concerning attention behavior during familiarization, a repeated-measures ANOVA with looking time as dependent measure, language group (Catalan, Spanish, bilingual) and familiarization condition (TB or GM) as a between-group factors and trial (first, last) as repeated measures revealed a highly significant effect of familiarization trial [ F (1, 48) = 42.9; p = 0.0001; η 2 = 0.47], and no effect of language group or condition and no significant interactions [familiarization trial × language group: F (2, 48) = 1.15; p = 0.32; η 2 = 0.04; familiarization trial × condition: F (1, 48) = 1.7; p = 0.19; η 2 = 0.03; familiarization trial × language group × condition: F < 1].
highly significantp < 0.00010.0× alphaqualifiedgold
The non-parametric one way ANOVA of prediction scores distribution among categories was highly significant for all three metapredictors ( p < 0.0001 for all predictors with VEST3 Kruskal-Wallis statistic K = 156.1, REVEL Kruskal-Wallis statistic K = 113, ClinPred Kruskal-Wallis statistic K = 168).
highly significantP <0.00010.0× alphaqualifiedgold
Highly significant differences ( P <0.0001; Mann–Whitney) were seen between concentrations of these variables in patients with metastatic disease compared with localised disease ( Figure 1 ) with median values (IQR) respectively of 22.2 (4.2–111) vs 5.7 (0.6–11.5) mg l −1 for CRP, 189.2 (114.8–303.4) vs 82.3 (575.5–131.1) μ g l −1 for OPN and 186.4 (89.6–336.2) vs 102.5 (61.6–153.9) μ g l −1 for CA9.
highly significantP < 0.00010.0× alphaqualifiedgold
Regarding schistosomiasis, cysteine peptidases, such as papain, Schistosoma mansoni cathepsin B1 (SmCB1) and cathepsin L3 (SmCL3) and Fasciola hepatica cathepsin L1 (FhCL1) do not induce allergic reactions in mice or hamsters and were shown instead to elicit reproducible and highly significant ( P < 0.0001) reduction of 50–65% in challenge S. mansoni and Schistosoma haematobium infection, via generation of polarized (papain, SmCL3, FhCL)- or predominant (SmCB1) type 2 responses involving release of TSLP, IL-4, IL-5, IL-13 and generation of IgG1 antibodies [24] , [25] , [26] , [27] , [28] .
highly significantP = 1 × 10−40.0× alphaqualifiedgold
This showed that treatment with both hiEV preparations exerted strong and highly significant reductions in trabecular bone volume fraction compared with untreated DMM joints (BV/TV% hiEV_serum: Beta = − 12.84, P = 1 × 10−4; hiEV_PS: Beta = − 9.94, P = 3.93 × 10−4).
highly significantp = 0.00010.0× alphaqualifiedgold
Permutational multivariate analysis of variance confirmed that compositional differences among the three associations were highly significant (F = 7.658, p = 0.0001, 9 999 permutations), a result corroborated by the rank-based test of similarity ( R = 0.6135, p = 0.0001).
highly significantP <0.00010.0× alphaqualifiedgold
After grouping patients with MC in active and in remission, a highly significant difference in median FC concentrations between active MC and IBS groups ( P <0.0001) was identified ( Table 3 ), whereas median FC concentrations of patients with MC in remission did not significantly differ from patients with IBS ( Table 3 ).