Barely Significant

Excerpts

514,629 sentences

highly significantp < 0.00010.0× alphaqualifiedgold
As expected, FSHD2 patients showed a highly significant (Mann–Whitney U test; p < 0.0001) D4Z4 hypomethylation (11 ± 7%; range 3–30%) compared to controls (51 ± 12%; range 19–76%).
D4Z4 Hypomethylation in Human Germ Cells.
Cells · 2024 · PMC11394335
highly significantp < 0.00010.0× alphaqualifiedgold
Statistical analysis (one-way ANOVA) confirmed that the differences in healing rates between the larva-treated groups and the infected control were highly significant (F = 31.842, p < 0.0001) ( Fig. 4 ). 3.3 Microbiological analysis Bacterial load, measured as CFU/swab of P. aeruginosa , decreased significantly in all treatment groups compared to the infected control (B) ( p < 0.05).
highly significantP value < 0.00010.0× alphaqualifiedgold
S1) indicated that there were highly significant differences between endemic and introduced species based on measures of average distance ( t = 5.897, df = 114.1, P value < 0.0001), while there were no significant differences based on measures average similarity ( t = 0.958, df = 112.5, P = 0.34).
highly significantp < 0.00010.0× alphaqualifiedgold
did not reach statistical significancep = 0.091.8× alphaplainly factual
The association of duration of use remained highly significant for moderate or greater AR ( p < 0.0001) but the association with moderate or greater MR did not reach statistical significance ( p = 0.09, one-sided) while the trend for moderate or greater TR remained statistically significant ( p = 0.007, one-sided).
a significant trendP < 0.00010.0× alphagold
According to data published by the Companion Animal Parasite Council website ( www.capcvet.org ), the percentage of Ohio dogs tested positive for exposure to the Lyme disease spirochete by the SNAP 4Dx Plus Test was 0.39% (218 of 54,963) for 2011, 0.55% (250 of 45,376) for 2012, 0.56% for 2013 (543 of 96,016), and 0.62% (102 of 16,343) for 2014 as of April 23, 2014, showing a significant trend of increase ( P < 0.0001, Chi-square test for trend).
With the HEMI groups, although LIB appeared to induce a slight decrease in reversal learning during both dark phases, these differences did not reach statistical significance upon comparing between the HEMI Sham and Blast groups [Time: F (4.687, 103.2) = 39.35, p < 0.0001; Group: F (1, 30) = 0.2318, p = 0.6337; Time × Group: F (46, 1,380) = 0.4483, p = 0.9995; Subject: F (30,1,380) = 26.52, p < 0.0001]. 3.2 Cognitive flexibility of the reversal learning The main purpose of the reversal learning phase is to evaluate cognitive learning flexibility of the HEMI and NCAR mice.