This revealed a highly significant correlation with R 2 = 0.42 and P < 0.0001 (Figure 3c ).
Excerpts
A weak but highly significant correlation (r=0.34, p=0.0001) was observed between the percentage of just-passing candidates correctly answering a part 2 question and ChatGPT’s probability of answering it correctly.
Notably, significant suppression of proliferative activity was observed at 24 h (P < 0.05), with highly significant inhibition and negative proliferation observed at 72 h (P < 0.0001).
As shown, the models were overall highly significant ( p < 0.0001) with no significant lack of fit ( p > 0.05).
Together with the highly significant differences (Two‐tailed paired t ‐test P < 0.0001; n = 65) in the average (±SD) counts of unique gene clusters obtained from complete versus complete plus partial gene catalogues ( Supplementary Data 1 ) suggests a strong effect of partial gene sequences on gene diversity, and in turn, gene discovery.
Results In all postoperative assessments, there was significant improvement in the grade of dysphonia ( p < 0.004) and highly significant reduction in the size of glottic gap and prolongation of maximum phonation time ( p < 0.0001).
In all cases, pair-wise comparisons of each AuQD treatment with each corresponding combined AuQD and laser treatment were highly significant: p < 0.0001, especially with Staphylococcus aureus and Listeria monocytogenes .
After 9999 permutations, Adonis2 (PERMANOVA) analysis on the same Hellinger transformed and batch corrected data indicates that rumen community structure is highly significant ( P = 0.0001) with regard to the diet, as well as significant ( P < 0.05) in all pairwise comparison between each diet.
Not surprisingly, all six regressions are also highly significant (p < .0001).
For the IGRA, comparisons between ChAdOx/ChAdOx and both heterologous regimens also revealed highly significant differences ( p < 0.0001) with stronger results for the heterologous regimens, but no statistically significant difference between both heterologous regimens ( p = 0.812; see Figure 5 ).
6c ) Stratified by 30-day survival, we found a highly significant correlation between LRT neutrophil elastase and galectin-3 in survivors only (Fig. 6d, r = 0.54, p < 0.0001), an effect that was also driven primarily by patients with ARDS, as well as patients classified to the hypoinflammatory subphenotype (Fig. 6e–f ).
This model showed a better fit, with a higher explained variance, R 2 = 0.3139, and a highly significant global F test, F(3,76) = 11.59, p < 0.0001.
Quantitative analysis confirmed this observation, demonstrating a highly significant increase in the number of CD68 + cells in the bone marrow of LP-18 M animals ( p < 0.0001) (Fig. 8 ).
Both correlations were highly significant (p<0.0001) (Table 6 and Figure 2 ).
A two-way ANOVA revealed a highly significant effect of genotype across the three forebrain structures tested, F (1,31) = 55.97, P < 0.0001.
The overall model was highly significant (P ≤ 0.0001) and was able to predict 93.7% of the cases of AKI.
Difference in scored mean marks was highly significant in term-ending-examination ( P < 0.0001, t = 5.754, df = 121.9).
For plipastatins, this effect compared with that of the control without lipopeptide was statistically significant ( p = 0.0023, using the Dunn's multiple comparison test) for 300 mg.L −1 of the sample and extremely significant ( p < 0.0001) for the higher concentration (500 mg.L −1 ) of plipastatins.
The mean of difference between two group was statistically highly significant ( P <0.0001) 4 th weeks onwards.
When treated with EAE-AS, the comparison of Caspase 3 expression between neurospheres and N2a is highly significant ( p < 0.0001).
A statistical significant effect was found for each covariate and the joint test for all covariates was highly significant (p<0.0001).
All H3K27Me3-, H3K36Me3-, H3K9Me3-, and H3K4Me2-nucleosome levels and the cfDNA concentration showed a weak, but statistically highly significant correlation coefficient with the percentage of MAF ( r = 0.33, 0.31, 0.32, and 0.21, respectively; p -value < 0.0001, and r = 0.28; p -value < 0.001, respectively) ( Figure 2 ).
All T 2 values are highly significant ( p < 0.0001), indicating a strong, consistent influence of factors (time from surgery, speed of walking) on the electromyographic profile.
A highly significant positive correlation ( ρ = 0.95, P < 0.0001) between expression levels and the normalized difference between ω mus and ω cas ( δ ω ) provides confirmatory support for our results ( fig. 3 B ).
For all parameters in the Friedrichs criteria in both active and placebo group, the p -value from screening to weeks 1, 2 and 4 was highly significant ( p value ≤ 0001).