One-way ANOVA reveals that the differences of heavy metal concentrations in earthworms between the nonpolluted and polluted areas in this study were highly significant ( p < 0.0001, Table S5 ).
Excerpts
It showed that: - the regression of K on ln(weight) was highly significant (P < 0.0001, a = 0.172), demonstrating a positive correlation between weight and condition factor; The PROSPER method for selecting fish 655 Figure 3.
After subtracting background fluorescence, we noticed a highly significant (p<0.0001), 2–2.5-fold decrease in mCherry fluorescence intensity at the TetO repeats on the anaphase compared with the G1-phase chromosomes ( Figure 1A, B ).
Overall, zymosan treatment which was used for positive control resulted in a highly significant increase of both types of NETs, i.e., “cell free”- and “anchored”-NETs in bovine PMN ( p < 0.0001; Figures 3E–H ).
The correlation between the 3 different assays was highly significant ( p < 0.0001).
There was also a highly significant effect of sex, with survival reduced in males compared to females (Cox mixed effects model: z = 7.34, N = 438, P -value < 0.0001).
The mean of c-KIT expression values (c-KIT/B2M ratio) was calculated for both benign (1.72) and malignant (0.138) groups and the difference resulted highly significant (p < 0.0001).
Furthermore, the variance analysis (ANOVA) presented in Table 4 disclosed that the quadratic model was exceedingly significant at P < 0.0001 for the estimation of phenolics from JATE.
Our χ 2 analysis indicated that these group differences were highly significant ( Figure 7 ; χ 2 =36.7; df=1, p=0.0001), suggesting that the HIP14 knockout disrupts behavior-related correlated firing in striatum.
For the concentration of IL-5, the omnibus test was highly significant (Kruskal-Wallis, χ2 3 = 30.59, p < 0.0001), and the pairwise comparisons showed that non-infected mice had lower levels of IL-5 compared to all infected groups ( Fig 3a ).
The complex showed highly significant expression levels and complex formation ( P < 0.0001) in all combinations when compared with mock across all capture-detection schemes (fig.
All these differences were statistically highly significant ( P < 0.0001).
AMOVA that was conducted by grouping the accessions according to their geographic regions of origin and without grouping revealed a highly significant variation among accessions and regions as well as within accessions ( Table 2 ; P < 0.0001).
The multiple linear regression analysis showed that second-order polynomial models were adequately accurate to predict the relevant responses because not only were highly significant ( p < 0.0001), but also had insignificant lack-of-fit values ( Table 4 and Table 5 ).
Highly significant levels of IBD were found across all catchments (North and South Islands) ( p < 0.0001), and when tests were conducted among the South Island populations (excluding Rotorua and Wairarapa), the IBD values remained significant ( p = 0.002; Figure S2 ).
The regressions implicating altitude and latitude of provenances were highly significant ( P < 0.0001), resulting in R 2 ranging between 0.21 and 0.51 (Table 2 ).
In all cases, there were highly significant correlations (Linear regressions; whole period: r 2 = 0.292, F 1,453 = 188.1, P < 0.0001; 2015: r 2 = 0.252, F 1,157 = 54.3, P < 0.0001; 2016: r 2 = 0.377, F 1,134 = 82.6, P < 0.0001; 2017: r 2 = 0.343, F 1,158 = 84.0, P < 0.0001; SI Appendix , Fig.
3.5 Correlation between NSE 48h and mRS at 90 days We found highly significant positive correlation between NSE 48h levels and mRS at 90 days ( r = 0.400 and p < 0.0001) ( Figure 2 ).
The primary endpoint was archived by 53% of the patients in the rhPTH(1-84) group compared with only 2% in the placebo group, which was a highly significant difference ( P <0.0001).
On the first day after surgery, median pain levels were highest in the MT group at 7(6, 8), followed by MS at 6(5, 7), and lowest in the TT group at 4(3, 5), with the differences being highly significant ( P < 0.0001).
As expected, the discriminatory ability of all five cryptic RNAs was highly significant ( P < 0.0001) in the frontal cortex and amygdala in FTLD-TDP, with AUC ranging 0.79–0.98 in amygdala and 0.81–0.94 in frontal cortex (Fig.
According to t‐test statistics, SGCD significantly outperformed all other methods, with differences reaching the highly significant level of p< 0.0001 ( **** ) (Figure 4C ).
Screens of 11 known antibiotics and other drugs revealed that Fexinidazole, Corallopyronin A and Rapamycin reduced the number of Wolbachia clusters infecting sheath cells but only Fexinidazole and Corallopyronin A showed a highly significant difference (p < 0.0001) compared to the control group.
The decline close to the cell bodies was not significant (37 ± 3% to 26 ± 4%; Figures 3E and 4A ; t -test, P < 0.08; n = 31), but the three-fold decline at longer distances (>250 μm) was highly significant (14 ± 2% at P36 to P40 to 4 ± 1% at >P41; t -test, P < 0.0001).
The mixed effects model confirmed that location was a highly significant predictor of nesting (z = -7.942, P < 0.0001), whereas probe type was not (z = 1.205, P > 0.05) for the three probe types deployed at all locations (A330, 737–800, 747–400): however, when all probes are considered across all locations, 86% of blockages occurred in probes with a diameter range of 5–8 mm.