Barely Significant

Excerpts

514,629 sentences

highly significantp value < 0.00010.0× alphaqualifiedgold
In the case of the non-sensitive membrane proteins, the motif was found only in 5 out of 143 sequences demonstrating a highly significant correlation between the presence of the motif in an SAS and its cotransin sensitivity (p value < 0.0001 according to Fisher ́s exact test) [ 21 ].
highly significantp<0.00010.0× alphaqualifiedgold
Analysis of variance (ANOVA) with two factors (delay time and perturbation frequency) revealed a highly significant interaction (n = 8 subjects, F 4,70 =110.2, p<0.0001), confirming the interdependence of feedback delays and frequencies of constructive/destructive interference.
highly significantp < 0.00010.0× alphaqualifiedgold
Compared to the total number of candidate genes (2476) from the SSH.qtl intervals and the number of known genes on autosomes (22,644, also excludes mitochondrial genes and haplotypes) this result is highly significant ( p < 0.0001) based on a hypergeometric test, which suggests positive enrichment of CF genes in the identified SSH.qtl intervals.
highly significantp < 0.00010.0× alphaqualifiedgold
Nevertheless, its effect remained highly significant (p < 0.0001), confirming a strong association between SF-AGR and PJI occurrence. 3.5 Receiver operating characteristic curve We used the PJI group as the positive sample and the aseptic revision group as the negative sample, and then performed feature modeling based on SF-AGR, SE-AGR, ESR, CRP, and SF-PMN% ( Figure 3 ).
highly significantp < 0.00010.0× alphaqualifiedgold
ASA concentrations > 1000 μM (10,000 μM and 16,000 μM) impaired the mitochondrial metabolic activity, which is equivalent to aerobic cellular respiration, revealing highly significant differences in comparison to the remaining concentrations after 3 (16,000 μM: p < 0.0001–0.01) and 7 (10,000 μM and 16,000 μM: p < 0.0001) days of cell culture with a visible decrease in their respective RFUs.
highly significantp < 0.00010.0× alphaqualifiedgold
Tukey’s multiple comparison test showed highly significant differences between the control and remission groups ( p < 0.0001), the control and active phase groups ( p < 0.0001), as well as between the remission and active phase groups ( p < 0.0001).
highly significantP < 0.00010.0× alphaqualifiedgold
In each of the three analyses, there was a negative, highly significant correlation between salmon stock development and watermill development (Period 1260–1940: declining stocks for periods without data: r = −0.813 and P < 0.0001; Period 1260–1940: constant stocks for periods without data: r = −0.828 and P < 0.0001; Period 1550–1940: declining stocks for periods without data: r = −0.903 and P < 0.0001).