Excerpts

2 a), and differences among feeding groups were highly significant (ANOVA F 7, 88 = 292, P < 0.0001 for FB NY ; F 6, 54 = 204, P < 0.0001 for MC SC ).

nose position in HC and TC (Figures 3C,D ) indicated highly significant body posture differences (slope differences: U = 143; P < 0.0001) in shocked vs. non-shocked mice in the first 15 min after reopening the door (Figure 3E ).

Results ANOVA Results of a conventional analysis of variance of the log-transformed data for grain yield indicated highly significant genotype x stress-level interaction (p<0.0001).

The Kruskal-Wallis test indicates a highly significant statistical difference between IUCN conservation statuses across the different local status classes (p-value < 0.0001).

All smooth functions were highly significant ( P < 0.0001).

A two-way ANOVA revealed a highly significant effect of genotype across the three forebrain structures tested, F (1,31) = 55.97, P < 0.0001.

When PLT count bias between Sysmex PLT‐I and PLT‐F was plotted against MCV, a highly significant inverse relationship was demonstrated ( p < 0.0001), showing that low MCV (microcytosis) strongly correlates with the overestimation of PLT count by the impedance method (Figure 2 ).

There was a clear difference in the soma areas of the NK1r cells that were retrogradely labelled with CTb (range, 116-1084 μm 2 ; median, 228 μm 2 ) and those that were not (range, 52-625 μm 2 ; median, 101 μm 2 ), and this was highly significant ( P < 0.0001; Mann–Whitney U test).

Analysis of variance (ANOVA) revealed highly significant ( P <0.0001) genetic and environmental effects for tocopherol content and composition.

The logistic regression model showed orographic lift to be a highly significant predictor of the probability of low altitude soaring (Wald test, p < 0.0001).

Quantitation of this data indicated a highly significant (p < 0.0001) increase in FRET efficiency after SENP6 knockdown compared to siNT-transfected cells as well as a larger distribution of the data ( Figure 6 E), suggesting variability in the structure of the foci.

After 12 months, uMCP1 excretion was lower in the tolvaptan than in the placebo group, but did not reach statistical significance until 24 (13.8 ± 3.4%, P<0.0001) and 36 months (14.4 ± 3.7%, P<0.0001).

The multiple linear regression analysis showed that second-order polynomial models were adequately accurate to predict the relevant responses because not only were highly significant ( p < 0.0001), but also had insignificant lack-of-fit values ( Table 4 and Table 5 ).

This difference was statistically highly significant (p = 0.0001) (Figure 5 ).

However, increasing arsenate concentration had a highly significant effect on normalized growth rate ( p < 0.0001; Figure 3 A).

The developed models were appropriate for demonstrating the relationship between variables, as they were highly significant ( p < 0.0001).

A highly significant difference was observed in the proportion of discharged and expired patients across the APACHE II score categories ( p <0.0001) with number of expired patients increasing with increasing APACHE II score.

Furthermore, there was a highly significant improvement in motor experiences of daily living, as indicated by the decrease in MDS-UPDRS Part II scores ( p < 0.0001) and the increase in the Schwab and England Activities of Daily Living Scale scores ( p = 0.002).

At the end of 3 weeks; WOMAC score showed highly significant difference within ( P < 0.0001) and significant difference between groups ( P = 0.040) also by Time × group interaction ( P = 0.024), VAS showed highly significant difference within groups ( P < 0.0001).

Quantification of the staining revealed a marked increase in oil red staining intensity in Hpa2-KO pancreas, exhibiting statistically highly significant differences between wt and Hpa2-KO pancreas (Fig. 1F , lower panel; 2.5 ± 0.7 vs 133.4 ± 23.3 for wt and Hpa2-KO pancreas, respectively; p < 0.0001).

The ANOVA of the quadratic regression model demonstrated that the model was highly significant with a very low p -value ( p < 0.0001) through F -test.

We conducted a subgroup analysis excluding patients with CKD to compare high versus low calcification groups, and the results were highly significant with a P value <0.0001.

After logarithmic transformation of both variables, their distributions approached normality ( P > .15 for FVIII; P = .045 for inhibitor titers), and a strong, highly significant negative correlation emerged (r = −.74; P < .0001; Figure 2 ).

Crucially, the interaction between genotype and group status was highly significant (F 2,509 = 22.14, p < 0.0001, η 2 = 0.080), with a statistical power of 99%.

This should be cleared up, and the second test is also highly significant (P=1x10-4) so it is hard to reconcile it/interpret alongside the first mantel test.