Differences in tumor recurrence was highly significant for both SK-MEL-28 and MM649 (p<0.0001, Log-rank (Mantel-Cox) Test).
Excerpts
Both results are highly significant ( p < 0.0001, φ = 0.17 regarding overall publications and 0.18 in the case of lead authorships).
Accessions with different polymorphisms at bPb-9668 and bPb-0003 showed highly significant differences in salinity tolerance ( P < 0.0001, Figure 5A ; Supplementary Table S2 ).
There was a highly significant effect of reversibility ( F (1,23) = 14.43, P < 0.0001), indicating that subjects were slower to respond to the reversible pictures involving 2 people than to the irreversible pictures involving 1 person and an object, regardless of the grammatical structure of the sentence.
There was a highly significant ( p < .0001) difference in clinicians’ knowledge transfer questionnaire scores pre- and post-educational session.
A significant trend was seen with an increasing frequency of PIK3CA copy number gain in those with invasive PSCC disease (p<0.0001): PeIN 10/58 (17%) and primary PSCC 84/199 (42%).
A highly significant variation ( P < 0.0001) among the genotypes for both WSC accumulation and remobilization per GDD was found in all environments.
Each Spearman correlation was highly significant ( p < 0.0001), except for the relationships of sleep with pain ( p = 0.0008), with general activity ( p = 0.0004), with walking ability ( p = 0.0068), and with relations with others ( p = 0.0029).
Hazard functions followed a significant trend across risk groups (χ 2 = 52, p < 0.0001).
The difference in heme levels between the Sham group and the ischemic core region was highly significant (P < 0.0001) ( Fig. 2 d).
Prevalence among HC accounted for only 7% and the results were highly significant ( p <0.0001; Fig 1B ).
A highly significant correlation ( r = 0.96; P < 0.0001) was found between kidney weight and glomeruli number ( Fig 2D ).
In addition, the RGR showed a decreasing trend with increasing seed mass, regardless of population and year of collection (Seed Mass: F 1,643 = 174.16, P < 0.0001).
0153), becoming highly significant at the end of the diet ( p < 0.0001; Figure 1A ).
A significant 2.5-fold decrease in cellular ATP was observed upon AA AgNP exposure ( p = 0.0040) with a highly significant elevation in mt depolarization (3.3-fold vs. control; p < 0.0001).
Interestingly, cytology parameters also showed highly significant differences between benign lesions and healthy controls (all p < 0.0001).
The results indicate that plants in the SR at T12 exhibited the highest BC load (bcH) (1.94 × 10 06 ± 8.81 × 10 05 particles·mL −1 ) while plants in the RR at T12 exhibited an intermediate BC load (bcM) (7.26 × 10 05 ± 1.83 × 10 05 particles·mL −1 ), with a highly significant difference compared to the SR at that time point ( p < 0.0001).
All these differences were highly significant at P < 0.0001.
The results ( Table 2 ) showed a highly significant ( p = 0.0001) decrease in the total lignin content, from 19.67% (raw biomass) to 6.68% (4% NaOH-pretreated biomass), representing approximately 87% lignin removal ( Figure 1 ).
The difference in representation of our potential targets of T cell recognition and the “pseudotargets” of randomly selected sets in peptides that really elicited T cell response was highly significant for both pentapeptides (39.9% versus 10.2%, P < 0.0001, Cohen’s d = 27.50) and hexapeptides (99.0% versus 73.7%, P < 0.0001, Cohen’s d = 16.2).
By contrast, in 0.3 pmol MO zatxn7 SPL morphants, we observed a highly significant decrease in the number of Purkinje cells at 5 (90+/−18, n = 5, p <0.0001), 6 (104+/−25, n = 6, p <0.0001), and 7 dpf (143+/−23, n = 6, p <0.0001) ( Figure 6D–6F ), strongly suggesting that partial zebrafish atxn7 depletion partly compromised, but did not slow down Purkinje cell differentiation.
The difference among the three countries was highly significant (χ 2 = 502.84; p < 0.0001).
The multivariate analysis performed on all healthy dogs shown no age influence ( P = .2363), but a highly significant breed effect ( P < .0001).
Although, the fit for regression equation was poor for maize (R 2 = 0.14) and rice (R 2 = 0.16), and was moderate for soybean (R 2 = 0.35), these regressions were highly significant ( P < 0.0001) and indicate that the predictor variables still provide information about the response even though data points fall further from the regression line.
This baseline log-ratio was highly significant (p < 0.0001) in the model.