Barely Significant

Excerpts

514,629 sentences

highly significantp = 3.81 × 10 −1270.0× alphaqualifiedgold
The correlation between total viral genome copies and sub-genomic E gene copies was highly significant ( p = 3.81 × 10 −127 ), but a high level of variance was observed between live viral titres measured by focus forming assay and both total and sub-genomic RNA titres ( Figure 4 a).
highly significantP =1.0 × 10 -1250.0× alphaqualifiedgold
Compared to size-matched random genomic regions, K122Q-bound enhancers showed highly significant enrichment of the canonical CRE motif (Fold Enrichment=13.7, P =1.0 × 10 -125 ), with 42.5% of enhancers containing the motif versus 3.1% of background regions ( Supplementary Fig. 2 ).
highly significantP = 1.0×10 −1240.0× alphaqualifiedgold
We found a highly significant association (P = 1.0×10 −124 ) of the risk allele at the LIPA locus with LIPA mRNA levels in these cells explaining ∼50% of the variance in the expression of the gene ( Figure 6 ).There were no other highly significant associations between CAD risk alleles and gene expression at the novel loci ( Table S7a and S7b ).
highly significantP = 6.11 × 10 -1220.0× alphaqualifiedgold
We observed a lesser, but still highly significant, overlap between H3K27me3 marked loci and gene body methylation in CIMP-L1 (13.1%; P = 6.11 × 10 -122 ) and CIMP-L2 (8.5%; P = 1.6 × 10 -78 ) cancers, but did not observe any correlation in CIMP-neg cancers, which likely is owing to the scarcity of which gene body methylation occurs in these cancers.
highly significantP = 3e-1200.0× alphaqualifiedgold
Hypergeometric tests revealed that the number of mutations in coding sequence compared with noncoding sequence was higher than expected by chance, suggesting a highly significant enrichment of mutations in protein-coding genes ( P = 3e-120).
highly significantp = 1.9 × 10 −1180.0× alphaqualifiedgold
The CytoTRACE score showed a weak but highly significant negative correlation with latent time (Spearman ρ = −0.25, p = 1.9 × 10 −118 ), indicating that, although capturing distinct facets of the transcriptome, the two orthogonal approaches suggested on a common developmental trajectory from mesophyll precursors toward terminally differentiated guard cells ( Tables S1 and S2 ). 3.2.
highly significantp = 4.05 × 10 -1180.0× alphaqualifiedgold
Results Disease-specific transcriptomes were defined in IBD [8697 transcripts], CD [7152], and UC [8521], with the most highly significant changes in single genes, including CD177 (log 2 -fold change [LFC] = 4.63, p = 4.05 × 10 -118 ), MCEMP1 [LFC = 2.45, p = 7.37 × 10 -109 ], and S100A12 [LFC = 2.31, p = 2.15 × 10 -93 ].
highly significantp = 8.54×10 −1160.0× alphaqualifiedgold
In particular, highly significant genome-wide associations signals were observed in the coding region of the translocase of the mitochondrial outer membrane gene (TOMM40: rs2075650, p = 8.54×10 −116 , OR = 4.48; rs157580, p = 9.6×10 −35 , OR = 0.51 and rs8106922, p = 1.17×10 −25 , OR = 0.57), upstream of the apolipoprotein C-I gene (APOC1: rs439401, p = 8.82×10 −29 , OR = 0.54), inside the poliovirus receptor related 2 isoform delta gene (PVRL2: rs6859, p = 7.87×10 −28 , OR = 1.7 and rs3852861 p = 5.32×10 −11 , OR = 0.64) and between TOMM40 and the APOE gene (rs405509, p = 2.29×10 −27 , OR = 0.57).
highly significantp = 1.36e-1150.0× alphaqualifiedgold
We observed a highly significant relationship between the minor and major allele copy-number estimates obtained from LOHHLA and ASCAT (p = 1.36e-115, rho = 0.70, Spearman’s rank test; Figures 1 B and S1 A), supporting the utility of LOHHLA to accurately estimate copy number and LOH.
highly significantP = 8 × 10 − 1140.0× alphaqualifiedgold
Although we cannot rule out the possibility that widespread shallow oscillations persisted, a comparison between the same genes in Ctrl and SCNx groups showed a dramatic and highly significant (Wilcoxon signed-rank test, P = 8 × 10 − 114 ) decrease in amplitude after SCN lesion (Fig. 1 L, left).
highly significantP = 10 -1130.0× alphaqualifiedgold
What the reviewer fails to mention is that because 32% of genes do change orientation and given a sample size that will make expectations highly significant, the null hypothesis of no change will be rejected by a more significant P value (P = 10 -113 ) by Fisher test, therefore rejecting the WGD model .