Results ANOVA Results of a conventional analysis of variance of the log-transformed data for grain yield indicated highly significant genotype x stress-level interaction (p<0.0001).
Excerpts
However, multiple regression analysis indicated that the quadratic terms (X 1 2 , X 2 2 and X 3 2 ) were highly significant ( p < 0.0001) for the extraction of TPC and is revealed in Table 3 , as for the antioxidant activity.
11.2) was highly significant (t = −5.72, df. = 1846, p < .0001).
There was a highly significant increase of 40% (relative risk (RR): 1.4; [1.27, 1.55]; p < 0.0001) in admission rates in the female children’s and the adolescents’ group (RR:1.32; [1.24, 1.41]; p< 0.0001) between the pre-COVID-19 and peri-COVID-19 periods in 2019 and 2021, respectively.
The Egger’s test result was highly significant (t = 6.60, p < 0.0001), indicating potential asymmetry and suggesting the likelihood of publication bias ( Supplementary File S26 ). - Similarly, in the OS multivariate analysis, the funnel plot showed some studies lying outside the triangular area, consistent with significant heterogeneity.
The mean severity of glistening based on subjective assessment was 0.57 ± 0.60 in the Z-Flex, and 1.82 ± 0.90 in the Acrysof IQ group, and the difference was highly significant (p<0.0001).
contortus was found to occur in 60% of the flocks, showing a highly significant variation in regional occurrence (P < 0.0001).
The difference in unique alleles between lines was 43,194 SNPs and highly significant ( P <0.0001).
A total of 210/337 genes demonstrated negative correlation coefficients with all metallothioneins (F, G, H, M and X), giving a highly significant P value ( P <0.0001).
A significant association with N (p < 0.01), indicating a higher anxiety trait score, and evidence of highly significant between-study heterogeneity (p < 0.0001, I 2 = 74%) were found in the S allele carriers group.
2 A; P < 0.01), and this difference in response between lean and obese subjects was highly significant (Fig. 2 A; interaction P < 0.0001).
There was a highly significant difference between TTV VL assessed in the Mpox-Vac group versus the DGV-Vac group ( p < 0.0001).
The number of SWATH windows was the most critical parameter with a highly significant (p < 0.0001) impact on the number of proteins quantified.
A highly significant correlation (r = 0.475, p <0.0001) was also found between the Ct values of the concordant positive saliva and NPS specimens.
Overall, there was a highly significant difference between the methoxyflurane and placebo group (estimated treatment effect, −15.1 mm; 95% CI −19.2 to −11.0; p<0.0001).
The log-rank test confirmed highly significant differences between categories (χ 2 = 517.7, df = 2, p < 0.0001), while the log-rank test for trend supported a strong linear association between increasing frailty and decreasing survival (χ 2 = 514.6, p < 0.0001).
The effect of the two process factors on the size distribution of the MPSM1–15 can be accurately described by a statistically highly significant model ( p < 0.0001) ( Table 3 ).
Parametric Student’s T-test comparisons coupled with Fischer Combined Probability test, show a highly significant difference (combined p < 0.0001) between the Ulva sp. and Cladophora sp. scaffold test groups, for all four cell concentrations, as well as between the scaffolds’ test and control groups.
The difference in OS between patients with the molecularly highly similar tumors A_IDH and A_IDH_HG tumors was highly significant (A_IDH_HG vs A_IDH: HR 2.43, 95% CI 1.73-3.40; P < .0001).
Daily meal preparation frequency showed a significant trend towards a healthier dietary profile for ECI scores ( p < 0.0001) and DINE-fibre score when cooking on more than just one occasion per day ( p < 0.0001).
Correlations were also highly significant (p=0.0001) for NFF among different trails, with the coefficients ranging from 0.36 to 0.46.
The logistic regression model was highly significant (p < 0.0001, Nagelkerke R2 = 0.35).
The quadratic regression model was highly significant, which was evident from the F-test with a very low probability value ( p <0.0001).
Chi Square analysis of these total success rates confirmed a highly significant difference between account holders and personal attackers [ χ 2 (1) = 232.6, p < .0001].
In this model, %p‐tau217 was highly significant ( p < 0.0001), and a 3% point (approximately 1 SD in the CL < = 25 group) higher %p‐tau217 was associated with an odds ratio of 5.4 (95% CI: 4.1 to 7.2) for identifying brain amyloidosis.