Barely Significant

Excerpts

514,629 sentences

highly significantP value = 9.06 × 10 −2390.0× alphaqualifiedgold
EV4A,B ; Dataset EV8 ) and found a highly significant overlap (OR = 5.72, P value = 9.06 × 10 −239 using all significant genes by JSD magnitude; OR = 14.98, P value = 3.43 × 10 −200 using top 1000 ranked by JSD magnitude for both) between differentially methylated genes identified by JSD in the isolated epidermis and whole skin during aging, supporting the validity of the original data in whole dorsal skin.
highly significantP =1.59×10 −2250.0× alphaqualifiedgold
Cytochrome P450 enzymes such as CYP2A7 and CYP2A13 score highly as well, and these genes are implicated in bladder cancer but not normally expressed in breast tissue [ 47 , 48 ]. Results for alternative edge weights w ′ = w /2 are shown in Additional file 1 : Figures S7–S9, again with highly significant differences between real and shuffled edge selections (M–W P =1.59×10 −225 for ROC AUC, P =5.02×10 −213 for nDCG, and P =4.12×10 −181 for Spearman correlation P -values).
Protein interaction disruption in cancer.
BMC Cancer · 2019 · PMC6823625
highly significantp = 5.550 × 10 –2250.0× alphaqualifiedgold
The correlation between the relative FC strength (to social-communicative-action system minus to manipulation-action system) during social-communicative-action perception and the relative activation strength (social-communicative-action perception minus manipulation-action perception) was highly significant (Pearson R = 0.48, p = 5.550 × 10 –225 , Fig. 5 a); Likewise, the correlation between the relative FC strength (to the manipulation-action system minus to the social-communicative-action system) during manipulation-action perception and the relative activation strength (manipulation-action perception minus social-communicative-action perception) was also significant (Pearson R = 0.486, p = 3.934 × 10 –231 , Fig. 5 b).
highly significantp = 3.4e‐2230.0× alphaqualifiedgold
Highly significant positive correlations were observed between harvest CD34 and post‐thaw CD34 (Pearson's correlation coefficient r = 0.97, p = 3.4e‐223) and between WCC and TNC ( r = 0.88, p = 5.1e‐112), suggesting these highly correlated measures could be used interchangeably (Figure 1 ).