The analysis of variance (ANOVA) revealed a highly significant effect of stone type and treatment on the mass loss of the samples (F3, 16 = 572.76; p < 0.0001).
Excerpts
Significance analysis of regression coefficients reveals the linear term A (trehalose) is highly significant ( p < 0.0001), B (lactose) is significant ( p < 0.05), and C (skim milk powder) is highly significant ( p < 0.01).
Associations between stiffness indices (MSF% and IRS) and histopathological grade of liver fibrosis were highly significant, too ( r = 0.75; p < 0.0001 for both parameters).
Results Both models revealed a highly significant disparity in work stress among the different groups ( P < 0.0001) ( Table 2 ).
This is a highly significant difference, as compared to the 49% de novo CNVs in vivo (p < 0.0001, binomial test).
ANOVA The one-way ANOVA in supplementary Table 8 revealed a highly significant effect of solvent composition on Arsenic recovery (F(3, 8) = 268.3, p < 0.0001).
3.2 Lennox–Gastaut syndrome The global association between etiological group and LGS was highly significant (Fisher's Exact Test, p < 0.0001).
The chi-squared test for heterogeneity of studies was highly significant ( P < 0.0001) suggesting that the reported HRs of the individual trials are substantially different.
At both RNA concentrations assayed, pDC-enriched PBMCs induced 10 to 19-fold higher levels of IFN-α upon transfection, with statistically highly significant differences ( p < 0.0001) in all cases; in the case of the S transcript, those levels were 1.5 higher when the dose was increased from 5 to 20 μg/mL.
Notably, TG7 and TG1 exhibit a highly significant increase in gene expression compared to normal human testes ( n = 3, **** p < 0.0001).
We tested whether WBISI correlated with indices based on fasting measures and found a highly significant correlation between WBISI and QUICKI (r = 0.905, p < 0.0001).
Comparison between the survival curves was highly significant (log-rank test, chi square=26.5; p <0.0001).
Fisher's meta analysis indicated that the observed increase in those paired studies was extremely significant (meta p -value < 0.0001).
70 The expression of pEGFR was investigated in recurrent NFPAs (n=47) and in non-recurrent NFPAs (n=55), and a highly significant difference was reported (p<0.0001). pEGFR positivity was greater in a higher number of recurrent NFPA and the H-scores were also higher in recurrent NFPA compared with non-recurrent (117 ± 6.0 versus 71.2 ± 3.7; p<0.0001). 17 The H-score is determined by adding the results of multiplication of the percentage of cells with staining intensity ordinal value (scored from 0 for 'no signal' to 3 for 'strong signal') with 300 possible values.
The Egger’s test result was highly significant (t = 6.60, p < 0.0001), indicating potential asymmetry and suggesting the likelihood of publication bias ( Supplementary File S26 ). - Similarly, in the OS multivariate analysis, the funnel plot showed some studies lying outside the triangular area, consistent with significant heterogeneity.
Referring to Table 3 , the improvement for FE625 over FE75 was significant for S1, S4, and S5, and the group mean showed a highly significant improvement of 12 percentage points (p = 0.0001).
When comparing the beta values obtained from each of the sub-ROIs across participants, we found highly significant (p<0.0001) correlations between M1 and S1 values (r(49)=0.89 and 0.77 for the intact hand and residual arm contrasts, respectively; see below, Author response image 2), suggesting that these two ROIs are not independent.
The model provides a highly significant fit as compared to a null model (null −2LL = 7.7, final −2LL = 21.2, χ 2 = 26.9, p < .0001; Nagelkerke R 2 = .77; AIC = 23.5).
A GLM with a negative binomial distribution with a log link function showed a highly significant positive effect of nest type on the number of trips per female [slope = 2.902, t = 7.078, P < 0.0001, dp = 1.119; dp is the dispersion parameter of the model, and when this is 1, the dispersion of the data from the model is within the predicted variance from the model (meaning the model fitted well to the observed data)].
As an example, the dependence of the exercise-induced change in the activity of Catalase on its initial activity was highly significant ( P < 0.0001) and strong ( R 2 = 0.43).
The model is extremely significant ( p < 0.0001) following the data processing and analysis, suggesting that the multiple regression equation accurately fits the experimental data and is statistically significant.
Measurement error The ANOVAs for centroid size and shape both reveal that the “Individual” main effect is highly significant ( P < 0.0001), which means that the variation among flowers greatly exceeds the measurement error due to “Imaging” and “Digitising” ( Table 1 ).
In SARS-CoV-2-infected cultures, there was a transient but highly significant 3.3× decrease in relative TEER at 4 dpi (Fig. 1H ; P < 0.0001).
The decline close to the cell bodies was not significant (37 ± 3% to 26 ± 4%; Figures 3E and 4A ; t -test, P < 0.08; n = 31), but the three-fold decline at longer distances (>250 μm) was highly significant (14 ± 2% at P36 to P40 to 4 ± 1% at >P41; t -test, P < 0.0001).
A significant decrease was found for the 4 Gy (p<0.001) and 8 Gy (p<0.05) irradiation groups at 4 h post-irradiation ( Figure 2C ), and highly significant changes across the dose range of 2–8 Gy (p<0.0001) were found at 24 h post-irradiation ( Figure 2D ).