For ratings of the extent to which a speaker was being ironic, there were highly significant main effects of Statement ( F (1,32) = 87.7; p <0.0001, η p 2 = 0.72) and Occupation ( F (1,32) = 13.5; p = 0.0009, η p 2 = 0.30), as well as a significant Statement X Occupation interaction ( F (1,32) = 8.2; p = 0.007, η p 2 = 0.20), a group X occupation interaction ( F (2,64) = 4.2; p = 0.047, η p 2 = 0.11) and a significant Statement X Occupation X Group interaction ( F (3,96) = 5.0; p = 0.032, η p 2 = 0.13).
Excerpts
By an adaption of the binomial test this level of success was highly significant (p<0.0001).
Lukenda et al [ 48 ] studied transient elastography (TE) in 52 KTRs and reported a highly significant negative correlation of kidney allograft stiffness on SWE with eGFR in 52 KTRs ( r = -0.640; P < 0.0001).
2 A; P < 0.01), and this difference in response between lean and obese subjects was highly significant (Fig. 2 A; interaction P < 0.0001).
Despite these adjustments, all the RRs for mental disorders in the presence of abortion in these data are substantial and highly significant at p < 0.0001.
The highest percentage of kidney pathology in PCR‐positive fish was detected in the 0+ fish age class (85%), this category shows a highly significant difference compared with age categories 1+, 2+ and 3+ ( p < 0.0001), whereas no significant differences were detected among the remaining groups (Table 1 ).
Because the sequence homology was highly significant (98% vs. 50% in random sequences, p value < 10 −4 ), NCF1B was selected as the surrogate for any chromosomal rearrangements detected in this study.
The highly significant reduction in the number of female offspring ( P < 0.0001, t -test with Bonferroni correction) was offset by the significantly higher number of male offspring compared with control ( P < 0.0001, t -test with Bonferroni correction).
Extremely significant improvements were observed in POPDI-six scores six months postoperatively (p=0.0001).
There was a non-significant value of lack of fit found in the statistical analyses ( p > 0.05), and a highly significant level of performance of the model measured at the parameter level ( p < 0.0001), which indicates that the mode is capable of being accurately predicted by the variation of the parameters (Prajapati et al. 2021 ).
The difference in 25(OH)D at visit 6 (16 weeks) was highly significant with mean difference of 40.5 ng/mL (95% CI: 32.8, 48.2; P < 0.0001).
We detected a highly significant interaction effect in the EPM between genotype and compartment [ F (2,96)=13.74, P <0.0001].
IL-6 and SAA1 showed somewhat weaker yet highly significant correlations with R 2 = 0.591 ( p < 0.0001) and 0.582 ( p < 0.01), respectively, for total PA, and R 2 = 0.486 ( p < 0.0001) and 0.449 ( p < 0.0001), respectively, for lung PA, ( Figure 3 a,c).
The second-order model obtained in terms of coded variables for extraction efficiency ( E (%)) of BB seed oil using UAE is given by Equation (1): (1) E % = 80.74 + 9.375 X 1 − 2.495 X 1 2 + 2.875 X 2 − 3.495 X 2 2 + 0.5 X 3 − 2.745 X 3 2 − 1.25 X 1 X 2 − X 1 X 3 + X 2 X 3 The ANOVA statistic for extraction efficiency (the response variable) proved that the regression model is highly significant, having a very high F-value of 46.67 and a low p -value of p < 0.0001.
All these differences were highly significant at P < 0.0001.
[ 23 ] identified human population density and total housing units as highly significant predictors of Ae. aegypti abundance (all p < 0.0001).
For stem diameter, the Treatment effect was not significant across corrections (Greenhouse–Geisser: MS = 6.23, F = 1.27, p = 0.332), but the effect of Time was highly significant (MS = 83.02, F = 123.96, p < 0.0001), showing consistent increases in stem diameter across weeks.
In addition, the genotype ( G ), environment ( E ) and genotype × environment interaction ( G × E ) variances of the branch number trait were highly significant ( P < 0.0001 ) in the GWAS panel (Table 1 ).
ANOVA results indicated that all proposed models were highly significant ( p < 0.0001), whereas lack-of-fit tests were not significant ( p > 0.05), suggesting a strong alignment between the experimental and predicted values.
For qPCR, the concordance correlation coefficients (CCC) for all pairs (A–B, A–C and B–C) exceeded 0.95, with highly significant Pearson correlations ( p < 0.0001), confirming strong concordance.
Moreover, the prevalence of subjects defined as being overweight/obese, having central obesity, and those with dyslipidaemia showed an increasing trend in all age groups (P-value<0.0001).
Accordingly, the second-order polynomial equation was established as follows: Y = − 9.16012 + 0.123691 × A + 0.143075 × B + 0.162185 × C − 0.0001375 × A × B − 7.5 × 10 − 5 × A × C + 3 × 10 − 5 × B × C − 0.0014058 × A 2 − 0.0013893 × B 2 − 0.0015433 × C 2 From Table 2 , it is evident that the model’s regression is highly significant ( p < 0.0001), with a lack of fit of 0.3369, exceeding the significance threshold of 0.05.
In lung adenocarcinoma, the most predictive signature generated from the Kim and colleagues ( 38 ) dataset revealed no association with survival when derived from ldvae [ P = 0.25 or −log 10 ( P ) = 0.6], whereas the BBKNN signature showed a highly significant predictive capacity [ P = 1e−4 or −log 10 ( P ) = 4; Fig. 5B ].
A one-way ANOVA revealed a highly significant effect of formulation on swelling (S w ) (F(7, 792) ≈ 43,176, p < 0.0001), with a very large effect size (η2 ≈ 0.997).
As can be seen in Table 4 , there was a statistically highly significant association ( p = 0.0001) between the variables.