Barely Significant

Excerpts

514,629 sentences

highly significantP < 0.00010.0× alphaqualifiedgold
Measurement error The ANOVAs for centroid size and shape both reveal that the “Individual” main effect is highly significant ( P < 0.0001), which means that the variation among flowers greatly exceeds the measurement error due to “Imaging” and “Digitising” ( Table 1 ).
highly significantp < 0.00010.0× alphaqualifiedgold
This finding was also clear for simulations on the directed AMBCA-based network when compared with the random directed network ( Figure 4B ), with a larger difference in predictive power (random − directed = −0.086), which was highly significant for unpaired ( p < 0.0001) and paired ( p < 0.0001) t testing.
highly significantp -value < 0.00010.0× alphaqualifiedgold
Moreover, Pd 1,2 LNP revealed a highly significant drop for the Her2/neu quantitative expression in the MCF7 treated cells with a p -value < 0.0001 compared to cisplatin and trastuzumab ( Figure 7 ).
highly significantp < 0.00010.0× alphaqualifiedgold
The model F-value of 51.97 indicates that the model was highly significant at p < 0.0001, which indicates that the sample is notable and that there is only a 0.010 percentage chance that this very large F-value could occur due to noise.
highly significantp < 0.00010.0× alphaqualifiedgold
For FLNA linkages to all three receptors in synaptosomes from AD versus age-, gender- and postmortem-interval-matched healthy control brain tissue, two-way ANOVAs showed highly significant main effects of diagnosis (CXCR4: F = 22.30, p < 0.0001; CD4: F = 188.52, p < 0.0001; CCR5: F = 179.43, p < 0.0001) and treatment (CXCR4: F = 44.39, p < 0.0001; CD4: F = 140.48, p < 0.0001; CCR5: F = 35.78, p < 0.0001) and a diagnosis–treatment interaction (CXCR4: F = 22.29, p < 0.0001; CD4: F = 109.68, p < 0.0001; CCR5: F = 79.78, p < 0.0001).
highly significantp < 0.00010.0× alphaqualifiedgold
The established regression model was highly significant ( p < 0.0001), the misfit term was not significant ( p > 0.05), and the correlation coefficient of the model, R 2 = 0.9909, and the corrected correlation coefficient, R 2 adj = 0.9791, indicated that the model was well fitted and the experimental error was small ( Table 2 ).
highly significantp < 0.00010.0× alphaqualifiedgold
Regarding HR ( Figure 4A ), a marked and highly significant decrease with age was observed during the first 12 months ( p < 0.0001; r = − 0.833), followed by a relative stabilization during adulthood characterized by a slight increase up to 120 months ( p < 0.0001; r = 0.084), and then another moderate increase between 120 and 220 months ( p < 0.0001; r = 0.300).