Population subdivision and gene flow We observed a highly significant subdivision between the two parks ( p -value < 0.0001), with F ST-ENA ’ = 0.2693 in 95% CI = [0.1631, 0.3964].
Excerpts
Additionally, acarbose significantly reversed IGT to NGT; an effect that was highly significant when compared to the placebo group (p<0.0001).
Decoding of uncued orientations was highly significant on both Switch (1–1.4 s after cue onset, corrected p = 0.0001) and Repeat trials (1.05–1.4 s, p = 0.0028, Switch > Repeat 1.25–1.4 s, p = 0.0295; Fig. 5 A , left panel inset).
Finally, the atorvastatin and liraglutide combination treatment group had the lowest body weight increase (and therefore the greatest reduction in weight gain) from 155 ± 5.1 g to only 224 g, when compared to both the HFD and the HFD/atorvastatin groups; this reduction was highly significant ( p < 0.0001). 3.2.
The odds of death in the AKI group compared to those without AKI was 3.7, which was highly significant (p < 0.0001), (95% C.I. odds 1.94-7.30).
A highly significant association between the presence of p53 gene mutation and nuclear accumulation of p53 protein was found ( P < 0,0001).
However, hospitals in the highest PerCI quintile showed a higher incidence of late specialty palliative care consultations as compared with hospitals in the lowest quintile (highest, 2.8% vs lowest, 2.2%, with a significant trend across quintiles; P < .0001) ( Table 2 ).
The correlation was statistically highly significant (the p -value being p = 0.0001***).
The mean decrease observed in the VAS scores and Nirschl stage at 2 week and 6 week follow up after steroid injection came out to be highly significant (p<0.0001) (Table 2 ).
Variance between the two years was highly significant ( p < 0.0001), contributing 39.4% to the total phenotypic variance of As accumulation ( Supplementary Table S2 ).
0.03%, p = 0.0005 (SG)], but was no longer highly significant ( p < 0.0001).
Statistical significance was defined as non-significant ( ns P -value >0.05), significant (* P -value ≤0.05), very significant (** P -value ≤0.01), highly significant (*** P -value ≤0.001), and extremely significant (**** P -value ≤0.0001).
There were highly significant main effects of YEAR ( LR 3,826 = 182.1, P < 0.0001) and SITE ( LR 3,826 = 76.5, P < 0.0001) and these are summarised in Table 5 .
Despite the strong Calcein background fluorescence we measured an increase in mean values of 13.0% (239 Nef vs Y 28 F; n = 22) and 14.1% (239 Nef vs Y 28 F; n = 22) which is highly significant (p < 0.0001).
Analysis of older group An ANOVA on SOA (4 levels) and load (2 levels) revealed highly significant main effects of both SOA [ F (3, 28) = 19.83, p < .0001] and load [ F (1, 30) = 22.73, p < .0001] and a significant interaction between the two [ F (3, 28) = 4.14, p < .01].
Here, the baseline model demonstrated the expected strong association between internal data redundancy and model performance, with a substantial and highly significant ( p < 0.0001, bootstrap test with 10,000 replications) drop in performance as the partitioning threshold is decreased (from an AUC value of 0.67 at 99% to 0.63 at 90%)—resulting in a lower similarity between the training and test data sets.
In the sagittal plane, displacement was highly significant ( Wald p values < 0.0001) in both patients and volunteers, in either half of depolarization (Table S16 ).
For both employed Cox Proportional Model, there are some consistent significant predictors: female gender is consistently associated with a lower hazard of diagnosis (HR ∼0.87, p < 0.0001), while there is a very small but highly significant increase in hazard with each additional healthcare visit (HR = 1.002, p < 0.0001).
Chi-square test for trend was highly significant ( p < 0.0001).
The differences between the control and FRET situations were highly significant (p<0.0001).
The paired t tests between sites and weather conditions showed that pairing was highly significant ( p < 0.0001 for wet vs dry at sites A and B and site A vs B in wet and dry weather; Figure 2 C).
The difference is highly significant ( P < 0.0001).
In the Kruskal–Wallis analysis, the Ma QTL was supported with a highly significant (P < 0.0001) value of the K statistic, 15.9 for malic acid content.
Effect of varietal difference and germination time on total tannin content Similarly, the total tannin content (TC) (mg TAE/100g DM) was found to decrease significantly with GT with a highly significant effect of variety (p < 0.0001, PES = 0.99).
Indeed, the fnr − mutant showed an 8-fold reduction in expression of type I fimbriae and a highly significant ( P < 0.0001) reduction in expression of fimA, ompT (plasmid-borne), and aatA .