Excerpts

Statistical analysis revealed highly significant differences between the control and diabetic groups ( p = 0.0001) and between the control and diabetic nephropathy groups ( p < 0.0001).

There was a highly significant difference in the conspicuity between malignant and benign lesions ( P < 0.0001).

As indicated in Fig 2C , the difference between malignant tissue and non-malignant paired tissue was highly significant ( p <0.0001), and the difference between malignant tissue and benign tumor tissue was significant ( p = 0.0115).

The expression of MMP10 , however, showed a highly significant decrease in adenocarcinomas (mean: 5.29) compared to adenomas (mean: 8.96, p = 0.0001) ( Figure 4 C, left panel).

IHC H‐scores (Figure 4D ) revealed a highly significant difference between WT and Vasn −/− mice ( p < 0.0001).

With a highly significant overall model ( p < 0.0001, F = 235.71) and a robust signal-to-noise ratio (46.08), the model reliably explains the variability in the response variable ( Table ).

In the overall population, a medium but highly significant correlation (r = −0.31, p < 0.0001) was found between age and the log-transformed values of antibody titres.

As indicated in Supplementary table 7 , the regression model was highly significant ( P < 0.0001), while the lack-of-fit term was not significant ( P = 0.4145).

Variance analyses (data not shown) confirmed great variability among RILs shown by highly significant values of F tests (F value 3.9, 2.4 and 1.82, p <0.0001 for dry and wet seasons and greenhouse experiments, respectively).

NextGenerationEU and Italian Ministry of Research CN00000041 Most notably, a strong and highly significant positive correlation emerged between CVS and ferritin Z ‐score ( r = 0.707; P < 0.0001), highlighting a robust association between increased mutational load and elevated ferritin levels, independent of age and gender (Figure 1C ).

Using the non-synonymous SNP in PTPDC1 as a CW-3 marker, growth curves were compared between heterozygous (n = 98) and homozygous q -steers (n = 165), indicating a highly significant effect of the Q allele on withers height ( p < 1 × 10 –4 ) and body weight ( p < 0.003) during all test periods, while the effect on chest circumference was significant only at day 382 ( p = 0.039) and day 438 ( p = 0.020) ( Fig 5A ).

Spearman’s correlation analysis revealed a highly significant association between the WOMAC total score and the CSI score (rho = 0.791, p < 0.0001), the PDQ score (rho = 0.766, p < 0.0001), and the PCS score (rho = 0.536, p < 0.0001) ( Table 2 ) ( Figure 3 ). 3.3.

3B1 and 3B2 indicated highly significant effects of gabazine ( p < 0.0001) and behavior ( p = 0.0002), and further indicated a significant interaction ( p = 0.0314).

The PERMANOVA showed a highly significant difference between the three populations ( F = 8.79, DF = 2, P = 0.0001) as well as for each pair of populations ( S2 Table ).

There were highly significant correlations between participants’ graphicacy index and their self-reported statistical knowledge (Fig. 3 B; r = 0.21, df = 3092, p < 0.0001) and mathematical knowledge (r = 0.22, df = 2028, p < 0.0001).

1 G and H), we observed a highly significant ( p < 0.0001) reduction in hypertrophy in the pre-stimulated cardiomyocytes.

In GLMs with male intensity as dependent variable, and female intensity, chromosome type (Z or autosomal) and the interaction term as independent variables, the interaction term was highly significant (zebra finch: p<0.0001, Table 1 ; common whitethroat: p<0.0001, Table 2 ).

Results from ANOVA indicated highly significant effects for time ( p ≤0.0001), genotype ( p ≤0.05) and their interaction ( p ≤0.0001) ( Supplementary data for Fig. 2 ).

ANOVA results ( Table 1 ) indicated that the model was highly significant ( p < 0.0001), while the lack-of-fit was not ( p = 0.5908).

Moreover, by taking into account the normal and intestinal metaplasia tissue to examine TF expression along the gastric MACS, the increasing trend was shown to be highly significant in both approaches; P <0.0001 by JTOM for both I s and I m scales ( Figure 2 ).

A highly significant positive correlation was observed between IL-15 and IL-22 (r = 0.606, p ≤ 0.0001).

The model-based estimate of the difference between the two in case of TRI was 57.5 s, and in CER was 144.2 s which is a highly significant improvement in both cases ( P < 0.0001).

Echocardiography The difference in Group I and Group II was highly significant in terms of both the baseline GLS (-13.37 ± 2.21 vs -19.11 ± 3.4; p < 0.0001) and GLS at 1-year follow-up (-11.23 ± 2.19 vs -13.47 ± 1.84; p < 0.0001).

Multiple regression analysis was performed using the quadratic polynomial model described by Equation (1), linking the independent variables to EE response: (1) Y = 56.32 + 0.5366 X 1 + 1.73 X 2 − 0.2654 X 3 − 0.4980 X 1 X 2 + 0.5468 X 1 X 3 + 0.0390 X 2 X 3 − 8.95 X 1 2 - 6.52 X 2 2 − 5.14 X 3 2 Analysis of variance for the regression model ( Table 2 ) revealed that the model exhibited a highly significant F-value of 830.28 ( p = 0.0001).

subquinaria revealed a highly significant effect of population type (sympatric versus allopatric; Wald χ 2 = 17.88, p < 0.0001), but no effect of individual population within population type (χ 2 = 1.02, p = 0.91) or trial (χ 2 = 2.12, p = 0.35).