Barely Significant

Excerpts

514,629 sentences

highly significantp = 0.00010.0× alphaqualifiedgold
For discrimination of patients with metastasized NEN from presumably cured NEN patients, the combination of cfDNA concentration, hypomethylation, and cfDNA integrity revealed a highly significant AUC of 0.908 (95% CI, 0.83 to 0.99; p = 0.0001) with a positive predictive value (PPV) of 91.1% and negative predictive value (NPV) of 66.7% at the chosen classification cutoff of 0.5 ( Figure 4 B).
highly significantp <0.00010.0× alphaqualifiedgold
As shown in Table 4 , all three predictors (entropy, density-TC, density-TN) are highly significant ( p <0.0001, after alpha correction because of multi-comparisons) when modeling the concreteness of a noun.
Distributional Measures of Semantic Abstraction.
Front Artif Intell · 2021 · PMC8892386
extremely significantp < 0.00010.0× alphaqualified
Figure 4 shows a bar graph of the average A , ε m a x , ε ∞ , τ r of the 4 cell lines and indicates the level of significance: where p > 0.05 is not significant (ns), 0.01 < p < 0.05 is significant (*), 0.001 < p < 0.01 is very significant (**), 0.0001 < p < 0.001 is extremely significant (***) and p < 0.0001 is extremely significant (****), raw values can be found in Table S1 .
nominally significantP = 1.0 × 10 −40.0× alphagold
Among the 12 loci associated with MG in the European meta GWAS, we identified nominally significant associations with same directional effects in the CTLA4 at 2q33 (rs231779, OR = 1.17, P = 1.0 × 10 −4 ), FAM76B at chromosome 11q21 (rs4409785, OR = 1.17, P = 0.030), and TNFRSF11A regions at 18q21 (rs7239261, OR = 1.14, P = 1.3 × 10 −3 ) in Japanese (Supplementary Table 2 ).
highly significantP < 0.00010.0× alphaqualifiedgold
In the resulting GLMM we found a significant difference in infection rate between female and male bat flies (averaged over species; X 1 2 = 4.56, P = 0.0327, higher in females), and highly significant differences in infection rates among bat fly species (averaged over sexes; X 2 2 = 52.83, P < 0.0001).
highly significantP < 0.00010.0× alphaqualifiedgold
The log-rank test for the overall difference among the four survival curves was highly significant ( P < 0.0001), providing strong evidence against the null hypothesis of no difference in survival distributions between the CTI groups.
highly significantp < 0.00010.0× alphaqualifiedgold
Most of all there was a highly significant (p < 0.0001) decrease of LVEF (Figure 2 ), systolic anterior velocity (Figure 3 and 4 ) as well as an increase of LVEDD. 2-D-strain decreased particularly in the anteroseptal, anterior and lateral areas but not at all in the inferior segment (Figure 5 and 6 ).
highly significantp < 0.00010.0× alphaqualifiedgold
The non-parametric one way ANOVA of prediction scores distribution among categories was highly significant for all three metapredictors ( p < 0.0001 for all predictors with VEST3 Kruskal-Wallis statistic K = 156.1, REVEL Kruskal-Wallis statistic K = 113, ClinPred Kruskal-Wallis statistic K = 168).