Barely Significant

Excerpts

514,629 sentences

highly significantp < 0.00010.0× alphaqualifiedgold
The non-parametric one way ANOVA of prediction scores distribution among categories was highly significant for all three metapredictors ( p < 0.0001 for all predictors with VEST3 Kruskal-Wallis statistic K = 156.1, REVEL Kruskal-Wallis statistic K = 113, ClinPred Kruskal-Wallis statistic K = 168).
highly significantp < .00010.0× alphaqualifiedgold
The two‐way ANOVA on square‐root arcsine transformed data showed highly significant effects of dose ( F 1,32 = 26.79, p < .0001) and of the interaction between dose and accession ( F 1,32 = 20.39; p < .0001), but not of accession ( F 1,32 < 0.42; p = .52), and the residuals from this model did not deviate from normality ( W = 0.95, p > .12).
highly significantP < 0.00010.0× alphaqualifiedgold
The ANOVA analysis confirmed that the selected models were highly significant ( P < 0.0001), with high r 2 values (>0.92), as well as confirming that only the statistically significant effects and the terms supporting the hierarchy were included in the model (details are presented in the Supplementary Materials ).
highly significantp<0.00010.0× alphaqualifiedgold
70 The expression of pEGFR was investigated in recurrent NFPAs (n=47) and in non-recurrent NFPAs (n=55), and a highly significant difference was reported (p<0.0001). pEGFR positivity was greater in a higher number of recurrent NFPA and the H-scores were also higher in recurrent NFPA compared with non-recurrent (117 ± 6.0 versus 71.2 ± 3.7; p<0.0001). 17 The H-score is determined by adding the results of multiplication of the percentage of cells with staining intensity ordinal value (scored from 0 for 'no signal' to 3 for 'strong signal') with 300 possible values.