Barely Significant

Excerpts

514,629 sentences

highly significantp < 0.00010.0× alphaqualifiedgold
Of the protein peak clusters found to be differentially expressed between the two groups, apolipoprotein A-II was found to be highly significant ( p < 0.0001) and double-loop classification analysis of the differentially expressed protein clusters demonstrated a mean prediction accuracy and specificity of 88% in separating brain tumor patients from controls.
Biomarkers of pediatric brain tumors.
Front Pediatr · 2013 · PMC3860910
highly significantp < 0.00010.0× alphaqualifiedgold
Of these pathways, Parkinson’s disease and Alzheimer’s disease (along with other neurodegenerative conditions), oxidative phosphorylation, metabolic pathways, and retrograde endocannabinoid signaling emerged as highly significant pathways ( p < 0.0001; Figure 5(a) and Table S2).
highly significantp<0.00010.0× alphaqualifiedgold
While pairing at this locus was abolished throughout the gonad in the hal-2 single mutant, the syp-3; hal-2 double mutant exhibited a highly significant increase in pairing over the hal-2 single mutant specifically in Zone 2 (p<0.0001), the same zone in which chromosome V PCs were shown to be active in the hal-2; syp-2 double mutant.
highly significantp < 0.00010.0× alphaqualifiedgold
There were highly significant ( p < 0.0001) associations between the abnormal expression of E-cadherin and Vimentin, E-cadherin and β-catenin, Vimentin and β-catenin, SMAD4 and E-cadherin, and a significant association between SMAD4 and Vimentin ( p = 0.0003), and SMAD4 and β-catenin ( p = 0.001) as shown in Table 1 .
highly significantp ‐value = 0.00010.0× alphaqualifiedgold
(i) Inter-group diversity and faultline dynamics Contrary to the potential for fragmentation, inter-group diversity remains robust across the faultline variations, with statistical tests yielding highly significant results (two faultlines: t -statistic = 201.464, p ‐value = 0.0001).
highly significantp < 0.00010.0× alphaqualifiedgold
The linear regression fitted to log length and number of oysters per sack was highly significant (adjusted r 2 = 0.93, F 58 = 809, p < 0.0001), and yielded the following predictive relationship between the number of oysters in a known volume and the mean oyster length: h = 10 (−0.3537 log b + 2.8361) , where h is SH (from umbo to growth edge) in millimetres, and b is the number of oysters in a 52.85 l volume (standard Louisiana sack).