In contrast, native jugular veins showed a clear, dose-dependent relaxation, reaching highly significant differences at the maximal concentration ( p < 0.0001 vs. all graft groups; Fig. 2 A).
Excerpts
RESULTS The first CFA model resulted in a misfit as the overall chi‐square test was highly significant ( χ 2 = 192.18, df = 80, p < .0001, CFI = .98, RMSEA = .051).
A three-way ANOVA illustrates that all individual factors except for temperature (ANOVA, p = 0.11, df = 2, 54) and all interactive factors had a highly significant influence on cell density ( p < 0.0001).
Differences in high-sensitive Troponin T (hsTnT) and N-terminal-pro hormone brain natriuretic peptides (NTproBNP) levels were found to be highly significant between patient groups ( p < 0.0001).
However, the difference in FF was statistically highly significant ( p <0.0001) even on multivariate analysis adjusted for BMI and PAPP-A levels, indicating that ART was almost certainly an independent predictor of low FF.
Furthermore, a highly significant increase was perceived in CD45 between the PBS and OVA + CFA-treated mice (MFI: 1.94 ± 0.66 vs. 4.06 ± 1.11; p < 0.0001) ( Figure 5 a).
On the other hand, the correlation of the MCQ scores with those obtained in the VP exam was highly significant (r = 0.452, p < 0.0001).
Results With increasing classes of PCT levels (<0.05, 0.05-0.49, 0.5-1.99, and ≥2 ng/ml), there was a significant trend ( P < 0.0001) towards older age, male gender, wider extension of lung involvement on HRCT, worse respiratory exchanges, and several other laboratory abnormalities.
In the most extensive study to date ( n = 208), the authors showed a marked difference in the vWF:Ag levels between critical (507%) and noncritical (288%) patients, which was highly significant ( p < 0.0001).
As for night-time, wakefulness during daytime, occupied the highest proportion (60.4 ± 1.8%) compared with the percentages of drowsiness, NREM sleep and REM sleep (9.4 ± 0.8%; 23.4 ± 1.5% and 6.7 ± 0.6%, respectively) and these differences were found to be highly significant (p < 0.0001; p < 0.0001; p < 0.0001) ( Fig 5C ).
Statistical significance was defined as significant (* p -value ≤ 0.05), very significant (** p -value ≤ 0.01), highly significant (*** p -value ≤ 0.001) and extremely significant (**** p -value ≤ 0.0001). 5.
The main effect of time was significant and there was a decreasing trend in LEDD (estimate = − 48.8, SE = 8.4, p < 0.0001).
Altered K/Na, Ca/Na and Mg/Na Concentration Ratios Are Strong Indicators of Na-Stress Exposure The ANOVA summary for concentration ratios of K, Ca or Mg with Na in examined test crop tissues showed a highly significant ( p < 0.0001) impact of NaCl salinity, whereas the soil Cd contamination as well as the CdxNaCl interaction were not significant ( Table S3 ).
The results indicated that there was a highly significant association between PD-L2 and PD-L1 in these tumors ( p < 0.0001) [ 107 ].
At the Central Sahara scale, a highly significant IBD pattern (both for Ritland and Loiselle kinship coefficients, p -value < 10 −4 ) was observed (R 2 ranging from 0.066 to 0.080; Figure S4 ).
We found a highly significant overlap between genes that were positively correlated with USO1 across the B-ALL samples and downregulated in USO1-depleted cells (Hypergeometric test; p < 0.0001), but not in genes that were upregulated in USO1-depleted cells (non-significant p value) (Fig. 4 F, Supplementary 5C & 5D).
Our results show that the main effects of loudness were highly significant on the head movement in Z direction [ t (98) = 5.9, p < 0.0001].
Finally, from April to October, the fat-to-protein ratio in high-yield cows was lower than in low-yield cows, showing a highly significant difference ( p < 0.0001).
The improvement from the unaided to the aided condition was in both groups at both presentation levels highly significant ( P < .0001).
All these parameters exhibited a highly significant correlation ( p < 0.0001) between the right and left eye.
As displayed by Figure 3 A, neurons from both P149 lines and P34 2 show as compared to CTLRs neurons a visible reduction of nuclear area, quantified by scoring 50 neurons per sample, as highly significant ( p value < 0.0001) ( Figure 3 C).
The difference between values for the TEVGs and PTFE grafts was highly significant ( p < 0.0001).
The ANOVA results ( Table 1 ) suggest that the model was highly significant with a high F value (F model = 62.16) and a very low probability p -value ( p < 0.0001) [ 21 ].
First, for all the descriptors, the panelist effect was highly significant ( p < 0.0001).
The model was highly significant (R2 = 0.62, p < 0.0001) and genotype ( p < 0.05), step frequency ( p < 0.0001) and hematocrit ( p < 0.05) were independent predictors of the 6-MWT distance.