Barely Significant

Excerpts

514,629 sentences

highly significantp = 0.000a p-value is never exactly 0qualifiedgold
On the other hand, male participants were better in practices (0.001), as illustrated in Table 5 . With regard to college type, it was shown that UCM participants were significantly better than those from UCP only in terms of knowledge ( p = 0.042); however, no significant differences were found in terms of attitudes and practices in Table 6 . Concerning the educational levels of the participants, no significant mean difference was seen in terms of KAP among either the UCP or the UCM participants ( p > 0.05), as found in Table 7 . Table 8 illustrates that the model is highly significant (F = 5.091, p = 0.000).
highly significantP<0.a p-value is never exactly 0qualifiedgold
and (iii) fibroblast-like cells. Vascular density of carcinomas compared with normal mucosa The mean vascular circumference in normal mucosa was lower than in either central or peripheral regions of both moderately and poorly differentiated carcinomas (Table I). These differences were all highly significant (P<0.O01).
highly significantp value = 0.000a p-value is never exactly 0qualifiedgold
From these regression models, the extraction yield, TFC, TFnC, TTC, TAC, FRAP, α -amylase, and α -glucosidase effects were highly significant ( p value = 0.000), with coefficients of determination ( R 2 ) ranging from 72.92 to 95.31.
highly significantp = 0.000a p-value is never exactly 0qualifiedgold
Additionally, poor glycemic control after PCI emerged as a highly significant predictor, substantially elevating the risk of IRA‐related INOCA (HR = 13.076 [5.433–31.468], p = 0.000) in the univariate analysis.
highly significantP = 0.000a p-value is never exactly 0qualifiedgold
Concerning the quantitative evaluation of new bone formation in the CSD, treatment either by PRF either alone (PRF group) or in combination with ZnONPs (PRF/ZnONPs group) revealed a highly significant ( P = 0.000) increase in the percent of CSD filling rate versus the control group (Fig. 2 ).
extremely significantp =0.000a p-value is never exactly 0qualified
The increase was extremely significant for the deformity angle (initial vs. 6th month, p =0.000; 6th month vs. 24th month, p =0.000) and kyphotic angle (initial vs. 6th month, p =0.003; 6th month vs. 24th month, p =0.000) in the thoracic and thoracolumbar regions during the first 2 years of the disease process.