Barely Significant

Excerpts

514,629 sentences

highly significantP < 0.000a p-value is never exactly 0qualifiedgold
At baseline level (pre-operatively), the difference in levels when compared concerning the biomarkers between test and control group, there was a highly significant difference with serum HbA 1c (P < 0.000), amylase (P < 0.000), total protein (P < 0.000), glucose (P < 0.000) except CRP (P < 0.085) which was not significant.
extremely significantp = 0.000a p-value is never exactly 0qualified
The age subgroup analysis demonstrated that the pooled prevalence of FIPV was 2% (95% CI, 1–3%) for cats over two years old; however, it significantly increased to 15% (95% CI, 8–22%) for kittens aged two years and below, with an extremely significant difference ( p = 0.000) observed between these two age groups ( Figure 6 B).
highly significantP=0.000a p-value is never exactly 0qualifiedgold
This indicated an increase in students’ understanding and awareness after the lecture and simulation training with a highly significant improvement (P=0.000).The highest mean score regarding evacuation disaster simulation competencies performance and total scores at pre- and post-educational intervention (Time (3.73), Process (3.13), and Transportation (4.12).
highly significantP = 0.000a p-value is never exactly 0qualifiedgold
concluded that lipid layer anomaly dry eye was the most prevalent type of dry eye in their study.[ 10 ] A study mentioned that the prevalence of dry eye was 95% in patients with blocked meibomian glands.[ 13 ] This occurrence of MGD in dry eye is statistically highly significant ( P = 0.000) in our study.
highly significantp = 0.00a p-value is never exactly 0qualifiedgold
In the bivariate models, a parent being away from ages of 0 to 17 and the father being absent during ages 13to 17 were both positively associated with the outcome and highly significant ( p = 0.00**).
highly significantp < 0.000a p-value is never exactly 0qualifiedgold
Comparative analysis with existing CGM methods reveals that our paper’s KNN model exhibits lower RMSE and MARD at 0.11 and 8.96%, respectively, and the fNIRS data were highly significant positive correlation with actual blood glucose levels ( r = 0.995, p < 0.000).