Barely Significant

Excerpts

27,100 sentences · 1 filter applied

highly significantp = 1.7 × 10 −90.0× alphaqualifiedgold
While no association with AER was seen in the patients reaching the current recommended treatment target of an HbA 1c ≤ 7.0% (N = 304, β [95% CI] = −0.017 [−0.137–0.101], p = 0.78), the association was highly significant ( p = 1.7 × 10 −9 ) in the patients with an HbA 1c > 7.0% (N = 2560, β [95% CI] = 0.17 [0.117–0.230]).
highly significantp = 1.92 × 10 –90.0× alphaqualifiedgold
As expected given the mesodermal origin of microglial cells 40 , we found highly significant associations between microglial cell-specific genes with the top 25% values of dN/dS and immune system-related GOs (χ 2 = 36.048, p = 1.92 × 10 –9 ), in agreement with previous reports of enrichment of immune system-related genes in microglial cells 41 .
highly significantp -value = 3.34 × 10 −90.0× alphaqualifiedgold
Recently, a meta-analysis of existing genome-wide association studies (GWASs) and two new GWASs of over 12,496 cases and 18,190 controls of European ancestry produced highly significant evidence of a strong association between the single-nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) rs4252707 (G/A) and non-glioblastoma glioma ( p -value = 3.34 × 10 −9 , OR = 1.19) 18 .
highly significantp = 8.3 × 10−90.0× alphaqualifiedgold
Strain energy as an empirical benchmark for CoA-induced arterial stiffening In the proximal aorta, there was a highly significant main effect of group (ANOVA p = 8.3 × 10−9), with post-hoc comparisons showing that all Prolonged CoA groups exhibited markedly elevated strain energy relative to controls (Fig. 1 ).
highly significantP = 8.947e−090.0× alphaqualifiedgold
Both skewness and CV successfully detected microtubule bundling during PPB formation, with the skewness and CV values for differences between the images with and without bundling being highly significant, but more so for CV (Mann–Whitney U-test, P = 8.947e−09 for skewness and P = 6.202e−14 for CV; Fig. 3 B, C, Supplemental Fig. 5 B).
highly significantp < 10 −80.0× alphaqualifiedgold
The univariate ANCOVA model applied (equation 2 ) revealed very highly significant differences between (1) the culinary oils investigated ( p < 10 −8 , with the exception of cis -2-alkenals for which p = 4.85 × 10 −3 ), and (2) sampling time-points ( p < 10 −8 ) for all aldehydes monitored.
clearly significantp = 1.14E-080.0× alphaqualified
This raises the question whether the observed alteration in mib1 ta52b mutant neural tube proportions may be a secondary consequence of this reduction in cell number? Our observations argue against this hypothesis: First, the injection of NICD promotes a partial but clearly significant (p = 1.14E-08) restoration of neural tube proportions (Fig. 8p,q ) while triggering only a minor and non-significant (p = 0.129) increase in neural tube cell number (Supplementary Fig.
highly significantp = 1.141E-080.0× alphaqualifiedgold
A separate Kruskal-Wallis test for geographical regions also indicated a highly significant effect ( H = 36.56, p = 1.141E-08), with Dunn-corrected comparisons confirming that both the Silesian Upland and the South Greater Poland Lowland differed significantly from the Silesian Lowlands ( p < 0.001), whereas their mutual contrast remained non-significant.
nominally significantP = 1.98 × 10 −80.0× alphagold
For menstrual fever (QOL impact), we observed a nominally significant association signal at chr6:154.33–154.46 Mb (top SNP: rs17181171; P = 1.98 × 10 −8 ) that overlaps over half of the 5′-end of the opioid receptor mu 1 ( OPRM1 ) gene (Fig. 5a ) and contains 65 high LD SNPs (Supplementary Worksheet S6).
extremely significantP = 2.92 × 10 –80.0× alphaqualified
Protein-coding regions displayed 11.29-fold enrichment, 5’ UTR regions achieved 8.00-fold enrichment, while extended intronic regions showed 1.32-fold enrichment at extremely significant levels ( P = 2.92 × 10 –8 ), suggesting that these regions may participate in complex genetic mechanisms through regulation of gene expression or function.
highly significantp = 3.7e-080.0× alphaqualifiedgold
The multiple comparison of normal mucosa versus CRC tumour tissue versus CRC cell lines resulted in highly significant p-values for all four ratios of circRNA/linRNA (circ0817/CUL5: p = 3.7e-08; circ3204/USP3: p = 6.4e-10; circ6229/METTL3: p = 2.2e-09; circ7374/TNS4: p = 1.7e-05).