Excerpts

This resulted in 8 highly significant ( p < 0.001) and correlated linear regressions (see S5 ).

The treatment effect of CsA-CE drop was highly significant ( p < 0.001) in all groups (Figs. 1 , 2 , 3 and 4 ).

The largest difference was for QTc intervals where the race difference was highly significant (p < 0.001 for both sexes).

The mean duration of T2DM was highly significant in the DPN group when compared with the DWPN group ( P < 0.001).

This correlation was highly significant, with a probability of ( p < 0.001), and high coefficient of determination (R 2 ) values of 90.2, 90.9, and 89.8 for cultivated, bush, and grazing land uses, respectively were observed.

Additionally, after removing the seasonality component, the Mann-Kendall test showed that there was a significant trend ( P < .001); therefore, we also included the trend effect in the BSTS model.

With the observed correlation of r=0.67 between the errors of the two methods, with a highly significant p < 1e-3, it can be seen that the labelling noise largely seeps into the model performance on the test set.

For MFCC2 with fmax = 12 kHz, there was a highly significant effect of gender (males were higher, p <0.001) and a significant effect of dataset (CLAC values were lower, p <0.05) with no significant effect of age.

Finally, the main effect of cue type was highly significant, F (1, 82) = 79.26, p = 0.001, η p 2 = 0.49, with greater mean |IRI error | when the pacing cue was a metronome (4.0% ± 0.9) than when it was a song (0.6% ± 0.2).

The positive slope for the latitude became highly significant when the bootstrap test for the regression slopes was applied using the 10,000 bootstrap samples (recruitment date: p < 0.001; latitude: p = 0.003).

The use of various hook sizes exhibited highly significant differences in the catch quantities of the target fish group, the nemipterids ( p < 0.001, Table 1 ).

This analysis revealed a highly significant three-way interaction of stimulation by risk-of-losing by trial-number ( z = 7.68, p < 0.001, OR = 1.47; Fig. 3 A).

The difference in SCC was highly significant ( P < 0.001) between normal, sub-clinical mastitis, and pasteurized milk.

By comparing the network to the 1,000 randomized networks, we found that the matrices, coefficient clustering and mean shortest path for our protein network are highly significant (p < 0.001).

The genetic divergence among populations was statistically highly significant (AMOVA: P < 0.001 in all cases).

The quantitative experiment results showed a highly significant correlation between the input and output DNA concentrations (t = 10.84, p < 0.001) with a mean slope value of 1.05, indicating the accuracy of our qPCR assay to estimate DNA abundance of T. pityocampa in bat faeces.

In Study 2, there was a highly significant association between future vaccination intentions against COVID-19 and the average VAX scale value ( r T2 = −0.72, t (258) = −16.69, p < 0.001).

The F ST pairwise comparisons among all groups corroborated results of the PCoA and allowed for the detection of highly significant (P < 0.001) values of differentiations (Table 3 ).

PL, FGW and SeB showed a highly significant (P < 0.001) correlation with THGW (lower panels in Fig. 1 ).

Correlation analysis Pearson correlation analysis showed highly significant ( p < 0.001) relationships among traits across the locations (Tables 5 and 6 ).

Specifically, the alpha-to-theta ratio revealed highly significant interactions over frontal ( F 2,56 = 15.460, p < 0.001, \documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \usepackage{amsmath} \usepackage{wasysym} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsbsy} \usepackage{mathrsfs} \usepackage{upgreek} \setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \begin{document}$

Pearson’s correlation analysis was employed to investigate the relationship between eigengene modules and clinical traits, demonstrating a highly significant correlation between gene significance for PTB + T2DM and the MEgreenyellow module (coefficient = 0.60; P < 0.001; Fig. 2 D).

The theft rate exhibited an increasing trend before the pandemic, with a monthly significant increase of 2.1% (IRR = 1.021; P < 0.001).

3 c shows a highly significant correlation (R 2 = 0.96; p < 0.001) between the NVC metrics determined by the two methods.

Data were visualized using GraphPad Prism 7.0 statistical software, with p < 0.05 indicating a statistically significant difference, p < 0.01 indicating a highly significant difference, and p < 0.001 indicating an extremely significant difference.