Excerpts

2 e) showed that these differences were highly significant for both genders (all p < 0.001; post-hoc to Model 1, Supplementary Table S2 ), except for girls’ grades in Sciences and Social Sciences, which were indistinguishable (b = − 0.47, p = 0.3895; post-hoc to Model 1, Supplementary Table S2 ).

the association between X and Y for different levels of M) showed a highly significant effect (t = − 3.76, p < 0.001) in participants with low perspective taking scores, whereas the association between right-wing extremism and willingness to help was not significant in participants with medium (t = − 1.74, p = 0.083) or high (t = 0.64, p = 0.520) scores in perspective taking.

The AMMI model showed that the mean square of the first principal component was highly significant (p ≤ 0.001) and the second principal component axis (p ≤ 0.05) but the third principal component axis (IPCA3) was not significant ( p > 0.05).

The results demonstrated that variations in fissure (X2), horizontal displacement (X3), tilt (X4), stress (X6), soil-displacement (X8), and denotes water-level (X9) exerted highly significant effects on dam safety ( p < 0.001).

The 100 μmol/L apigenin treatment led to a substantial and highly significant (P < 0.001) increase in sperm membrane integrity compared to control, improving from 40% integrity in control to 68% integrity with 100 μmol/L apigenin (Fig. 3 a).

All predictors of foraging habitat quality in the additive model were highly significant (p < 0.001; Table 2 ), with 51.1% deviance explained by the model, and over 99% of which was explained by the model’s fixed effects.

ANOSIM indicated that differences in the prey spectra between the three species were highly significant at prey family-level (R = 0.784, P < 0.001) but non-significant at the level of order (R = 0.079, P = 0.063).

This random subset was sufficient to establish the highly significant differences in GC content and contig size ( p < 0.001; Table 5 ); analyzing all 219 plasmid contigs would not have altered the conclusions and was therefore unnecessary.

The effect of trap model was highly significant (χ 2 = 50.6, df = 3, P > 0.001), whereas population of origin (χ 2 = 4.02, df = 3, P = 0.26), sex (z = −1.616, P = 0.106) and aquaria identity (z = 0.34, p = 0.73) were not.

The test results are represented in the respective plots using asterisks as follows: **** P < 0.0001—extremely significant; 0.0001 < *** P < 0.001—extremely significant; 0.001 < ** P < 0.01—very significant; 0.01 < * P < 0.05 -significant, P ≥ 0.05—not significant (ns).

A multivariate analysis through a linear mixed effects model (see Methods) reveals highly significant ( p − values < 0.001) correlations between FSLE, the QPI and the rate of attempted prey capture (see Table SI1 ).

Compared to 2008–2018 TC monthly means in the inside region, these elevations were statistically significant in December (W = 43, Z = − 3.16, p = 0.002, r = 0.47) and statistically highly significant in January (W = 79, Z = − 3.90, p < 0.001, r = 0.47), February (W = 62, Z = − 4.06, p < 0.001, r = 0.51), and March (W = 148, Z = − 3.92, p < 0.001, r = 0.46) (Supplementary Table S4 ).

Analyzed individually, 59.8% of obesity and metabolic process genes had significant and 31.3% highly significant (p < 0.001) effects on starvation tolerance.

The largest difference was for QTc intervals where the race difference was highly significant (p < 0.001 for both sexes).

The interaction between sugar and time was now highly significant (F 1,76 = 10.914, P = 0.001), with no significant effect of time (F 1,76 = 0.906, P > 0.05) ( Fig. 1E,F ).

The results indicated a highly significant (p < 0.001) attenuation of ROS production in GSTO1-1 deficient BMDMs (Fig. 3f ).

This difference is highly significant ( p < 0.001) and does not vary between participants with and without biophysical measurements (Table S2.1 ).

1 the highly significant correlation coefficients (Pearson correlation coefficient; p < 0.001) computed between ACTIm and gridded climate datasets indicate that the tree-ring network (dataset-1) used in this study is sufficiently large enough in order to capture large-scale climate signals across the Northern Atlantic region.

The best model was highly significant ( P < 0.001) and explained a medium–high level of variability in ocelot density (R 2 = 0.47, N = 49, Table 1 ).

A two-way ANOVA model explained 96% of variance in EDI-3-RF with all main effects (group: F(1, 156) = 4200; p < 0.001; gender: F(1, 156) = 123; p < 0.001), and the interaction was highly significant (F(1, 156) = 105; p < 0.001).

At the broad Mediterranean scale, the overall F ST value was 0.027 (95% CI = 0.014 to 0.042) for red mullet and 0.011 (95% CI = 0.007 to 0.016) for striped red mullet, and both values were highly significant (p < 0.001), supporting the spatial heterogeneity.

The fixed effect of the year variable was positive and highly significant ( p < 0.001) across all four cereal crops (Table 3 ), indicating a consistent upward trend in yields due to non-climatic influences for 1995–2018 period.

The RS-25 showed a highly significant positive correlation with the traits’ extraversion (r = 0.674, p < 0.001) and conscientiousness (r = 0.66, p < 0.001) in the NEO-personality scale, as well as a highly significant negative correlation with neuroticism (r = -0.62, p < 0.001).

In both context we found a highly significant main effects for CorrOpen (Competitive: beta = 463.71, 95 % CI [225.76, 701.66], t ( 154.99 ) = 3.82 , p < . 001 ; Cooperative beta = 205.24, 95 % CI [52.69, 357.79], t ( 162.28 ) = 2.64 , p = 0.008 ) (see Table s3 (supplement) for a list of significant effects in this linear model in both interactive contexts).

However, in stark contrast to this assumption the analysis of this relation showed a highly significant negative correlation ( Fig. 1B , R = −0.86, p < 0.001, Pearson).