Sixteen outlier loci were distributed at higher F st values than expected under neutrality (two loci highly significant, p < 0.01, loci 53 and 109, in the Coastal range), 25 loci were distributed at lower F st values than expected under neutrality (4 loci highly significant, p < 0.01, loci 180, 181, 194 and 254, both in the Coastal and Andean range).
Excerpts
The administration of DJ-1 resulted in a highly significant increase of the extracellular ATP generation after ischemia ( p < 0.01), independently of the DJ-1 form employed (Fig. 4 A).
In present study, starvation yielded highly significant ( P < 0.01) decreases in GSH contents of 14 day and 21 day starved O. mykiss fries, indicating lower resistance of starved fries against oxidative stress.
Among the physicochemical indices, organic matter had an extremely significant effect on TN and TK ( P < 0.01), while TN had a significant effect on TK and XN ( P < 0.05).
The maximum ankle joint inversion angle in the CAI group was significantly smaller than that in the non-CAI group, and the difference between the two groups was extremely significant (t = − 3.006, P < 0.01).
The HDL proportion showed a decreasing trend in response to dietary ESC and OS supplementation as compared with LS, ESF, and CS treatments ( P < 0.01).
The Arg72Pro and cancer incidence For malignant melanoma, the hazard ratio was 0.87 (95% CI: 0.77–0.99) for individuals with Arg/Pro and 0.78 (95% CI: 0.60–1.01) for Pro/Pro versus individuals with Arg/Arg with a nominally significant trend for a per-allele effect (p = 0.01); however, this was not significant after Bonferroni correction for eight tests.
Correlation matrix given in Table 3 also showed highly significant (p < 0.01) negative correlation of AAC with CT repeat (r = − 0.909).
The levels of statistical significance were p < 0.001 (extremely significant) and p < 0.01 (significant).
Across the three vegetation restoration stages, in the 0–50 cm soil layer, parameter A, total available water content, rapid available water content, slow available water content, and unavailable water content showed highly significant and positive relationships ( P < 0.01) (Table 2 ).
All models were highly significant (p value < 0.01), and predicted the latitudinal distribution of diversity across the Atlantic Ocean with high accuracy, with adjusted r 2 values ranging from 0.42 to 0.77.
Of these nominally significant ( p < 0.01) correlations, only age effects survived a stringent control for multiple testing, a finding replicated using the two alternative sleep variability metrics as well.
Results The results of ANOVA showed highly significant ( p < 0.01) effect of drought stress on all the studied traits (Table 1 ).
Differences between means were considered significant if p -values < 0.05 which is indicated in the figures by (*), highly significant if p -values < 0.01 which is indicated by (**) and very highly significant if p -values < 0.001 which is indicated by (***).
2 ) in controls, indicating that IONPs lead to a statistically highly significant reduction of this parameter (p < 0.01).
Analysis of variance (ANOVA) All evaluated traits showed highly significant variation across all treatments (P-value < 0.01) (Tables 3 , 4 , and 5 ).
For the 1-day-old female and male adults, highly significant differences ( P < 0.01) were found in the mean decreases in the JHIII titers after ultrasound treatment for 1 h, 12 h, and 24 h.
Cross-correlation of the first EOF’s amplitude with zonal and meridional wind stresses from ERA-Interim reveals the occurrence of a highly significant anticorrelation between SST and meridional wind stress [r = − 0.66 to − 0.39 with 99% confidence (p < 0.01)] (Fig. 2 c, right panel).
Hence for further functional analyses, we filtered only highly significant 2073 DEGs (1578 up-regulated, 495 down-regulated) with P value < 0.01 and Fold Change > 10.
All possible combinations between the studied pairs of traits showed a highly significant ( p < 0.01) positive correlation, except for the pairs involved potassium with all other traits.
The results revealed that the mean differences for FaP1A1, FaP2E11 and FaP2D12 were highly significant ( p < 0.01) while FaP2E2 and FaP2E9 was significant ( p < 0.05) ( Table 4 ).
, being highly significant (P < 0.01) with the inoculation of the first four fungi indicated.
The overall model is highly significant ( p < 0.01), indicating that all the parameters have impact on water loss.
The highly significant (P < 0.01) richness and Shannon diversity index values for samples from Western region forests could be attributed to the tropical nature of forests within this region such as sample K21 (Kakamega forest) which is considered an important biodiversity reservoir and the only remaining Guinea-Congolian tropical rain forest in Kenya 26 .
After removing one study from the analysis, the effect size for the thalamus became highly significant (g = −0.23, 95% CI = −0.38, −0.07, k = 8, Z = −2.67, p < 0.01, Q = 9.59, df = 7, p = 0.30, I 2 = 12.5) 20 .