In this CDA, all MANOVA tests yielded highly significant results ( p < 0.0001), indicating the robustness of the group separation.
Excerpts
The estimation of the variance component showed a highly significant behavior ( p < 0.0001) of the genotypes and the genotype x environment interaction across all the environments.
The highly significant ( p < 0.0001) genotype × year interaction also indicated the major influence of environment on the traits ( Supplementary Table S4 ).
Cox regression detected a highly significant constant temperature effect on post-storage germination (Wald χ 2 = 36.69, p < 0.0001).
Linear regressions for percentage of puffy fruit on the markers solcap_snp_sl_33701, solcap_snp_sl_8669, solcap_snp_sl_100164, solcap_snp_sl_20440, solcap_snp_sl_18619, solcap_snp_sl_4963, and solcap_snp_sl_531 located within 1-LSI on Chr 1 ( Figure 2 ) were highly significant ( p < 0.0001) in the validation population.
54.65%), but the existence of the genetic structure was still highly significant (φST = 0.453; p < 0.0001; analysis C).
The ANOVA of regression coefficient showed a linear response based on the p -value of ethanol concentrations, which were highly significant ( p < 0.0001), followed by microwave power and extraction time ( Table 2 ).
Chi square values for the independence between genotypes of RM136 and days to heading (early and late heading divided by the dotted line in Figure 1 ) were 26.880, 81.073, and 86.693 for Jpn1, Jpn2, and W1297, respectively, all highly significant ( P < 0.0001).
At the Central Sahara scale, a highly significant IBD pattern (both for Ritland and Loiselle kinship coefficients, p -value < 10 −4 ) was observed (R 2 ranging from 0.066 to 0.080; Figure S4 ).
This represents an almost five-times enrichment for the presence of the AAAUAA motif in this set of highly expressed transcripts for storage proteins (which is highly significant, with p < 0.0001, according to the one-sided Fisher’s exact test based on a 2 × 2 contingency table) with respect to transcripts not involved in the nutrient reservoir activity (represented by a random sample of 6258 protein-coding genes whose 3′ UTR sequence is identified in rice, which showed a presence of the motif in about 20% of the 3′ UTR sequence).
While this difference was highly significant in left and right-styled flowers ( p < 0.0001), the margin of success was notably reduced in straight-styled flowers ( p = 0.0139).
In contrast, genotypic variance was highly significant ( p < 0.0001), demonstrating substantial genetic variation for FLS resistance within the population.
Highly significant differences (P < 0.0001) were observed in inflorescence length, seed diameter ( Figure 4 ), and hundred-seed weight.
Second Study Rooting success was associated with a highly significant interaction between rooting environment and hormone treatment (F 8,15 = 137.93; p < 0.0001), with the model explaining 99.3% of the observed variance (R 2 = 0.99).
By 24 h, frankincense, lemon, lemongrass, patchouli, peppermint, geranium, palmarosa, and sage EOs exhibited a certain level of toxicity, indicating an extremely significant difference compared to the control ( p ≤ 0.0001).
This analysis confirmed highly significant effects of both treatment (χ 2 = 158.84, p < 0.0001) and time (χ 2 = 43.82, p < 0.0001) on germination.
The ANOVA revealed that the main effects of both the GS model and the growing season were highly significant for all traits ( p < 0.0001).
Factor Model Analysis According to the ANOVA results presented in Table 5 , the BCF model for As is highly significant (F = 27.74, p < 0.0001).
Weather Data Statistical analysis of weather data for the two seasons revealed significant differences in climatic parameters between 2020 and 2021, including temperature and rainfall, where the difference was highly significant between the two seasons ( p < 0.0001).
There was an extremely significant positive correlation of Cd content and accumulation in alfalfa seedlings with DW, FW, SS, RS and POD ( p = 0.0001 and p = 0.0001), but a significantly negative correlation with SR ( p = 0.0376 and p = 0.0341) and an extremely significant negative correlation with HP, SOD, CAT and APX ( p = 0.0001 and p = 0.0001).
Relationship between PHAS and PHA Patterns, and PHAS Pattern and Morphological Data The association between the PHAS and PHA patterns was highly significant and nearly complete (χ2 = 187.93; df = 20; p < 0.0001; Cramér’s V = 0.94).
Highly significant differences were found among the treatments (χ 2 = 154.0; d.f. = 3; p < 0.0001).
The model was highly significant as indicated by the high F -value (22.72) and the low p -value ( p < 0.0001), but also by the low lack of fit F -value (0.87) and its non-significant associated p -value ( p > 0.05).
The analysis revealed highly significant effects ( p < 0.0001) for environment, replicates within environments, lines (genotypes), and the genotype-by-environment interaction.
Across the three-day measurement period, foliar application of SiNPs elicited a highly significant increase in stomatal conductance ( p < 0.0001) relative to controls under ambient UV-B ( Figure 2 a), with values of 326 ± 2.7 to 596 ± 1.5 mmol m −2 s −1 in treated leaves versus 211 ± 2.1 to 414 ± 4.4 m −2 s −1 in controls.