The year of cultivation had a highly significant effect on all traits, with p -values ≤ 1.426 × 10 −10 , except for C18:2, which had a higher p -value of 0.014 but was still statistically significant.
Excerpts
The test statistic (t = 8.15, df = 29) yielded a highly significant p -value ( p ≈ 5.4 × 10 −9 ), and the 95% confidence interval (0.68–0.92) confirmed the robustness of this association ( Figure 1 A).
The results indicated that a cluster of highly significant SNPs represented by Chr2_67754173 ( p = 9.85 × 10 −7 ) was located downstream of Chr2T10180100, a gene encoding an LTP protein.
In contrast, highly significant differences were observed among the crop species (F 2,18 = 615.70, p < 0.000001; Table 1 ).
In striking contrast, the susceptible line KW5G321 exhibited severe disease symptoms, with a mean DSI of 75.98%, representing a highly significant difference between the two lines ( p = 5.3 × 10 −6 ) ( Figure 1 A).
A genome-wide association study (GWAS) screened 297,876 SNPs and identified highly significant associations ( p < 1 × 10 −5 ) with head smut resistance in sorghum.
The genotype × harvest season interaction was highly significant (Fg × hs = 4.00, p < 0.00001), indicating the presence of clones with distinct yield performance over time ( Figure 1 ).
The difference was highly significant (X 2 = 942.69, p < 0.00001).
The differences were found to be highly significant ( t -test, p < 0.00001).
There was a highly significant correlation between both dynamics rates (R = 0.769, p < 0.00001).
The results indicated that the pericarp browning index showed an extremely significant positive correlation with the expression of LOX2 (r = 0.95, p -value = 2.58 × 10 −5 ) and rotting rate (r = 0.95, p -value = 3.79 × 10 −5 ) and a high positive correlation with the MDA content (r = 0.92, p -value = 1.58 × 10 −4 ), GR activity (r = 0.91, p -value = 2.51 × 10 −4 ), the expression of PAL1 (r = 0.85, p -value = 1.80 × 10 −3 ), JAZ (r = 0.84, p -value = 2.47 × 10 −3 ) and PR-1 (r = 0.81, p -value = 4.23 × 10 −3 ).
Considering IC 50 value, NHFMEWF (156.32 ± 1.32 μg/mL) was estimated to be just around 50% less potent than that of acarbose (103.77 ± 1.02 μg/mL) in inhibiting α-amylase, which was also analyzed to be highly significant ( p = 0.000063) in contrast to the acarbose.
By 24 h, frankincense, lemon, lemongrass, patchouli, peppermint, geranium, palmarosa, and sage EOs exhibited a certain level of toxicity, indicating an extremely significant difference compared to the control ( p ≤ 0.0001).
In contrast, genotypic variance was highly significant ( p < 0.0001), demonstrating substantial genetic variation for FLS resistance within the population.
While this difference was highly significant in left and right-styled flowers ( p < 0.0001), the margin of success was notably reduced in straight-styled flowers ( p = 0.0139).
The interaction between the population origin and the applied treatment showed a highly significant effect (F = 59.88, p ≤ 0.0001), suggesting that the response to damage is significantly modulated by the genetic origin of the plants ( Table S4 ).
This analysis confirmed highly significant effects of both treatment (χ 2 = 158.84, p < 0.0001) and time (χ 2 = 43.82, p < 0.0001) on germination.
Second Study Rooting success was associated with a highly significant interaction between rooting environment and hormone treatment (F 8,15 = 137.93; p < 0.0001), with the model explaining 99.3% of the observed variance (R 2 = 0.99).
This represents an almost five-times enrichment for the presence of the AAAUAA motif in this set of highly expressed transcripts for storage proteins (which is highly significant, with p < 0.0001, according to the one-sided Fisher’s exact test based on a 2 × 2 contingency table) with respect to transcripts not involved in the nutrient reservoir activity (represented by a random sample of 6258 protein-coding genes whose 3′ UTR sequence is identified in rice, which showed a presence of the motif in about 20% of the 3′ UTR sequence).
The analysis revealed highly significant effects ( p < 0.0001) for environment, replicates within environments, lines (genotypes), and the genotype-by-environment interaction.
A highly significant treatment effect ( p = 0.0001) was obtained exclusively for LT, indicating that the mean response profile between the two groups differed only in the second year of repeated measurements ( Table 4 ).
There was an extremely significant positive correlation of Cd content and accumulation in alfalfa seedlings with DW, FW, SS, RS and POD ( p = 0.0001 and p = 0.0001), but a significantly negative correlation with SR ( p = 0.0376 and p = 0.0341) and an extremely significant negative correlation with HP, SOD, CAT and APX ( p = 0.0001 and p = 0.0001).
Linear regressions for percentage of puffy fruit on the markers solcap_snp_sl_33701, solcap_snp_sl_8669, solcap_snp_sl_100164, solcap_snp_sl_20440, solcap_snp_sl_18619, solcap_snp_sl_4963, and solcap_snp_sl_531 located within 1-LSI on Chr 1 ( Figure 2 ) were highly significant ( p < 0.0001) in the validation population.
The ANOVA revealed that the main effects of both the GS model and the growing season were highly significant for all traits ( p < 0.0001).
The model was highly significant as indicated by the high F -value (22.72) and the low p -value ( p < 0.0001), but also by the low lack of fit F -value (0.87) and its non-significant associated p -value ( p > 0.05).