Barely Significant

Excerpts

3,691 sentences · 1 filter applied

highly significantp < 0.010.2× alphaqualifiedgold
In full-light drought conditions (T 1 , T 2 ), dry matter accumulation and photosynthetic capacity were affected, with drought duration (D n ) showing highly significant negative correlations ( p < 0.01) with most physiological parameters ( RWC , LDW , G s , T r ).
extremely significantp < 0.010.2× alphaqualified
Correlation Analysis Between Nutrient Contents and Stoichiometric Characteristics of Different Components of Main Shrubs and Herbs in Karst Forests As shown in Figure 5 , for the stoichiometric characteristics of shrub leaves, the positive correlation groups were as follows: C content was significantly ( p < 0.05) positively correlated with C/K (r = 0.54); there were significant ( p < 0.05) or extremely significant ( p < 0.01) positive correlations between N content and P (r = 0.68), Ca (r = 0.62), and Mg (r = 0.60) contents, as well as between P content and Ca (r = 0.67) and Mg (r = 0.46) contents; K content was extremely significantly ( p < 0.01) positively correlated with K/P (r = 0.73); Ca content was significantly ( p < 0.05) or extremely significantly ( p < 0.01) positively correlated with Mg (r = 0.79), N/K (r = 0.61), and Ca/Mg (r = 0.47).
highly significantp < 0.010.2× alphaqualifiedgold
Joint ANOVA and Genetic Parameters Joint ANOVA for the treatments (environmental indices (E) and genotypes (G)) displayed highly significant differences ( p < 0.01) for all studied traits, and the interactions were significant for 12 traits and insignificant for 8 traits (DH, RWC, E, POD, Pn, Gs, PPO, and CAT) ( Table 2 ).
highly significantp < 0.010.2× alphaqualifiedgold
Further analysis of fruit quality showed highly significant positive correlations (between peel L* value and peel b* value, r = 0.98, ** p < 0.01), a highly significant negative correlation (between pH value and aroma compounds, r = −0.97, ** p < 0.01), and a highly significant positive correlation (between total phenols and tannins, r = 0.99, ** p < 0.01).
highly significantp < 0.010.2× alphaqualifiedgold
Sources of Variance for Yield Components and Grain Yield of Four Soybean Genotypes Across 13 Environments The combined analysis of variance across thirteen environments revealed highly significant effects ( p < 0.01) for environment (E), genotype (G), and genotype-by-environment interactions (G × E) for all measured traits ( Table 2 ).
highly significantp < 0.010.2× alphaqualifiedgold
Effects of Harvesting Intensity and Recovery Time on Understory Plant Diversity As shown in Table 3 , both harvesting intensity, recovery time, and their interaction had highly significant effects ( p < 0.01) on all four diversity indices: the Shannon–Wiener index, Simpson index, Pielou evenness index, and Margalef richness index.
highly significantp < 0.010.2× alphaqualifiedgold
Correlation Analysis of Soil Nutrients and Soil Enzymes From Pearson correlation analysis ( Figure 8 ), soil available P showed a highly significant positive correlation ( p < 0.01) with total p , with a correlation coefficient of 0.809; avail-able N showed a significant positive correlation ( p < 0.05) with organic matter and catalase, with correlation coefficients of 0.712 and 0.669, respectively; and organic matter showed a highly significant positive correlation ( p < 0.01) with catalase, with a correlation coefficient of 0.810.
highly significantp < 0.010.2× alphaqualifiedgold
The Correlations Among Biomass, Root Morphology and Architecture, and Non-Structural Carbohydrates Across both periods, the biomass of leaves, stems, and roots exhibited highly significant positive correlations ( p < 0.01) with both SS and ST ( Figure 6 ).
highly significantp < 0.010.2× alphaqualifiedgold
Interactive Effects of Nitrogen Levels and Growth Stages on Rhizome and Tiller Bud Density of Kentucky Bluegrass Nitrogen addition, phenological stage, and their interaction had highly significant effects on the rhizome bud density, tiller bud density, and total belowground bud density of Kentucky bluegrass ( Figure 2 a–c) ( p < 0.01).